Lego Serious Play in Psychology: Exploring Its Use in Qualitative Interviews
Stephanie Rose Penny J. Furness Department of Psychology,Sociology and Politics,Institute of Social Sciences,College of Social Science and Arts,Centre for Behavioural Sciences and Applied Psychology; Sheffield Hallam University,Sheffield,UKStephanie Rose is currently a masters student in Counselling at the University of Hong Kong and works at Oliver Wyman in the Human Capital department with a focus on employee work life sustainability and mental health. Stephanie has a strong interest in the use of innovative techniques for facilitation of dialogue and generation of qualitative data. Stephanie also has a masters degree in Psychology from City U and Sheffield Hallam University and a bachelors in Sociology from LSE.Penny Furness is a PhD,Chartered Psychologist and senior lecturer in Psychology at Sheffield Hallam University. She is also a BACP Accredited Integrative Psychotherapist with her own private practice. Penny has research interests in the psychology of health,chronic conditions and chronic pain,counselling practice,and healthcare applications of virtual reality interventions.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2388610
2024-08-31
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Abstract:Lego Serious Play (LSP) developed in corporate settings to encourage collaboration, problem-solving, and drive creativity. As a creative research method, LSP is relatively under-researched. The constructive 'build, share, listen' process of LSP has considerable potential to promote reflection and elicit talk in phenomenological research interviews. We draw on our experiences using LSP in interviews to explore the meaning of happiness with five young adults in Hong Kong, who had moved back to their parental home. We explain our approach and discuss the potential benefits, limitations and considerations when using LSP to enhance individual interviews. It is a participant-led approach, which reduces anxiety, enables 'flow,' self-expression and reflection, access to tacit knowledge, use of metaphor and symbolism. Considerations and limitations include the time burden, aspects of our approach which were more researcher- than participant-led, potential improvements to enhance data generation and ethical reflections on the cathartic nature of the LSP-supported interviews.
psychology, multidisciplinary