Abstract:Abstrak Peranan Direksi sangat dibutuhkan untuk meningkatkan penghasilan perusahaan sesuai tujuan dan maksud perusahaan. Sebagai organ Perusahaan, direksi dalam menjalankan tugasnya seringkali mengambil keputusan bisnis yang tidak sesuai dengan tugas dan fungsinya. Hal ini dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai pelanggaran yang dapat terjadi sebagai akibat dari adanya kelalaian dan/atau kesengajaan. Hal ini membawa dampak kepada pertanggungjawaban perdata direksi. Penerapan business judgment rule terhadap putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 915K/Pdt/2017 terhadap Direksi PT Pegadaian tidak dapat diterima sebab Direksi PT. Pegadaian tidak melaksanakan prinsip good corporate governance yang baik kepada pegawainya sehingga direksi PT Pegadaian wajib memberikan hak pegawainya atas pemutusan hubungan kerja dan melakukan pertanggungjawaban perdata dengan mengganti kerugian pegawainya. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 83/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby menjadi legitimasi terhadap penerapan business judgment rule terhadap Direksi PT Santos Sanjaya, dimana penerapan prinsip ini juga tidak dapat diterima oleh pemegang saham minoritas disebabkan Direksi telah melanggar prinsip kepercayaan (fiduciary duty) yang diberikan padanya dan tidak bertindak dengan hati-hati. Kata kunci: Direksi, Business Judgment Rule, Perusahaan, Pertanggungjawaban. Abstract Director plays a very necessary role to improve the company’s profit related to the company purpose and objective. As a company organ, a director might conduct decisions which is not in accordance with its task and function. It could be qualified as a violation which is possibly happen as a result of intentionality and/or negligence. It subsequently would lead the director to personal liability. The application of Business Judgment Rule to the Supreme Court of Indonesian Repubic Decision No. 915K / Pdt / 2017 against the Director of PT Pegadaian is unacceptable because he did not implement the Principles of Good Corporate Governance to his employees so that the Director of PT Pegadaian was obliged to give their employees right as the consequence of the unemployment and to perform civil liability by indemnifying their employees. The District Court of Surabaya Decision No. 83/Pdt.G/2016/PN. Sby became a legitimacy to the application of the Business Judgment Rule against the Director of PT Santos Sanjaya, where the application of this principle was also unaccepted by the minority shareholders because the Director violated the principle of trust (fiduciary duty) given to him and did not act with caution. Keywords: Director, Business Judgement Rule, Company, Liability.

Judicial Decision Analysis on the Debt Restructuring of Inc. Insurance Jiwasraya (Case Study of Verdict No. 170/Pdt.Sus-Pkpu/2021/Pn Jkt.Pst)

Juridic Analysis Of Revocation Of Homology For Delaying Debt Payment Obligations (Case Study between PT. X and PT. Y)

Legal Analysis of Corporate Insolvency: A Case Study of the Insolvency Resolution Process

Legal Analysis Of The Impact Of Debtor Bankruptcy On Bank Credit Payment Performance (Research Study At Bri Batam Branch Office)

The Considerations of the Panel of Judges in Rejecting the Business Judgment Rule Principles in Corruption Crime Case Decisions of PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya

THE REGULATORY IMPROVEMENT OF INSURANCE LAW REFORM IN ORDER TO PURSUE THE LEGAL CERTAINTY FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE INSURANCE COMPANY

Settlement of Bad Credit that is Tied to Mortgage Guarantee by Voluntary Sale at Bank Rakyat Indonesia Padang Sidempuan Branch

PERDAMAIAN YANG TERCAPAI DALAM KEPAILITAN YANG BERASAL DARI PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) (Studi Putusan No. 59/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2019/PN.Niaga.Sby)

Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Corporate Bankruptcy Status

Analisis Putusan Nomor 46 PK/Ag/2020 juncto Putusan Nomor 847/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Tng) Terhadap Sengketa Hybrid Contract

Accountability answers company insurance life based investing against the risk of failure to pay for policyholders

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BANKRUPTCY AND POSTPONEMENT OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS: ARE THEY SIMILAR?

Conflict of Law Enforcement by State Institutions over Abuse of Power and Authority: A Case Study of "Former President Director of PT. Pertamina"

Legal Reconstruction of Judges' Decision on Obscure Lawsuit Exception Based on Justice Value

Legal Protection For Creditors To Ensure The Fulfillment Of State-Owned Enterprises (Persero)’S Liabilities In The Indonesian Legal System

Limited Liability Company's Status After Insolvency: Dissolution or Rehabilitation?

Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 300K/PDT/2010 dan Keterkaitannya dengan Konsepsi Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen

The Efforts to Settle Non-performing Loans through the Execution of Mortgage Guarantees without a Court Decision

Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Direksi Perseroan

Legal Protection of Creditors Constitutional Rights as Citizens Due to Debtor Insolvency

SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES BETWEEN ELECTRICITY CONSUMER CUSTOMERS AND PLN IN PAYMENT OF ELECTRICITY BILL FINES