Abstract:This manuscript undertakes a disciplinary self-critique of the field of implementation science, a field which attempts to bridge the gap between evidence-based interventions and their practical application. Despite the heightened emphasis on health equity and racial disparities, the field's current discourse is limited by key epistemic shortcomings. First, even though prevalence of implementation gaps between racialized groups in the United States necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the systems perpetuating these disparities, the field does not operate with a general explanation for disparities not as a failure of systems, but a system historically and structural designed to produce disparities. Second, the field has attempted to address disparities without adequate dialog with a broad tradition of anti-racist and anti-colonial sociology, history and epistemology, and therefore risks a decontextualized analysis of disparities and under-informed approaches to achieving equity. Fortunately, scholarship from the Black radical tradition (BRT), such as the Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP), Critical Race Theory (CRT), and more broadly conceptual frameworks from post-modern, anti-colonial, Black feminist studies and social epistemology can offer to implementation science frameworks that center power dynamics and racialized oppression. This epistemic re-alignment of implementation research to "center at the margins" can enable the field of implementation science to more critically examine and dismantle systems that perpetuate racial inequalities in access to and utilization of health interventions. For example, normalization and dynamic fit, which are thought to be key mechanisms of implementation, are revealed in the light of this tradition of scholarship to be potentially problematic acquiescence to oppressive systems. Drawing from the concept of resistance anchored in the scholarship of the Black radical tradition as well as contemporary social epistemology such as the work of José Medina and Maria Fricker about epistemic justice, the authors further advance that implementation science could make more substantial contributions to the dismantling of racialized systems and actively work toward health justice through the transdisciplinary lens of resistance. This is a call to action for integrating implementation science with critical philosophical and theoretical perspectives rooted in Black studies and related insights, which have been acquired through the struggle for social justice, to inform the design of implementation strategies and research projects that improve health services and health outcomes for health disparity populations.

The Intersections of Health, Justice, and Equity in the Work of Research

Situating implementation science (IS) in res(IS)tance: a conceptual frame toward the integration of scholarship from the black radical tradition

Re-Engaging Individuals & Societies for Structural Evolution: A Brain Health Equity Neuropsychology Research Framework

Applying an intersectionality framework to health services research.

Creation to Dissemination: A Roadmap for Health Equity Research

Radical Healing Community-Based Participatory Research to Eliminate Health Disparities

Reflecting on "Beyond the Rainbow": Advancing 2S/Indigiqueer Health Equity

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Research: A Path Toward Precision Health for Everyone

Challenges and Opportunities for Paving the Road to Global Health Equity Through Implementation Science

Advancing Antiracism in Community-Based Research Practices in Early Childhood and Family Mental Health

Benefits and Challenges of Addressing Cultural Intersectionality for Program Development and Evaluation

An evolving case for centering health equity as a research priority in predominantly White academic medical centers

Intersectionalities of influence: researching the health of immigrant and refugee women

Leveraging Implementation Science to Advance Environmental Justice Research and Achieve Health Equity through Neighborhood and Policy Interventions

Operationalizing Equity, Inclusion, and Access in Research Practice at a Large Academic Institution

The great reconnection: Restorative justice as remedy for fragmented healthcare communities.

Becoming JEDI Warriors in Physical Therapy Research: A Multifaceted Approach

An intersectionality framework for identifying relevant covariates in health equity research

Advancing health disparities research and improving health for all

Examining privilege and power in US urban parks and open space during the double crises of antiblack racism and COVID-19

"Community engagement via restorative justice to build equity-oriented crisis standards of care"