Abstract:Post-stroke life reengagement has become an important driver of aphasia intervention (Chapey et al., 2000; Kagan et al., 2008; Simmons-Mackie & Azios, 2024). Complementary to impairment-focused treatment (Coppens & Patterson, 2018), life reengagement is a crucial intervention goal for each person with post-stroke aphasia (PWA). For stroke survivors with aphasia, the powerful psychosocial life changes accompanying the communication disorder underscore the critical need for aphasia therapies recognizing individual communication environments and other personal life factors (Hunting Pompon & Mach, 2022; Simmons-Mackie & Azios, 2024). With steady growth in ethnosocial diversity in the U.S. population, aphasia caseloads progressively reflect the growing ethnoracial and social heterogeneity of the general population (Centeno & Harris, 2021). The caseloads of speech-language pathologists involved with helping PWAs include individuals of different personal ethnoracial backgrounds (i.e., White, Hispanic, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander) and complex social profiles (e.g., gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic circumstances, religious beliefs, educational histories; Centeno et al., 2023). As the population rapidly ages and becomes more ethnoracially diverse in the country (Vespa et al., 2020), increased age-related vulnerability to cardiovascular complications, including stroke, especially in underserved Black, Indigenous, and People of Color, is estimated to result in larger numbers of older adults with complex ethnosocial life histories in post-stroke aphasia care (Centeno et al., 2023; Centeno & Harris, 2021; Feigin et al., 2019; Uomoto & Loughlin, 2016). Ethnosocial heterogeneity in aphasia caseloads calls for special attention to the individual life history of each PWA for person-centered culturally responsive aphasia intervention for life reengagement after a stroke (Centeno et al., 2023; Guerrero-Arias et al., 2020; Harris, 1997). Intersectionality, a central tenet in health equity and human rights (Bridges et al., 2017; Crenshaw, 1989), has been a valuable principle to focus healthcare policymakers, practitioners, and researchers on the multifactorial interactions that converge in individuals and social groups resulting in discrimination, marginalization, vulnerability to illness, and, in turn, inequities in health, care, and outcomes (Bridges et al., 2017; National Advisory Council on Minority Health and Health Disparities [NACMHD], 2023; United Nations Partnership on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities & United Nations Women [UN PRPD & UN Women], 2021). An intersectional healthcare framework can meaningfully transform approaches in policymaking, care, and research to improve services and minimize health inequities in vulnerable populations (i.e., ethnic/racial minority groups, people from limited socioeconomic environments, underserved rural communities, sexual and gender minority groups, and individuals with disabilities; NACMHD, 2023; UN PRPD & UN Women, 2021). An intersectional approach to health care shifts the focus from narrow, unidimensional, and discrete perspectives to a more nuanced, broader lens that recognizes how an individual person's ethnoracial and social identities can intersect resulting in forms of privilege or marginalization with an impact on health, care, and outcomes (Hankivsky et al., 2017; NACMHD, 2023; UN PRPD & UN Women, 2021; Wilson et al., 2019). Applying an intersectional perspective to aphasia services in ethnosocially diverse environments contextualizes clinical care by focusing speech-language pathologists on the complex individual ethnosocial profiles shaping well-being and life trajectories of each PWA (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, sociocultural history, geographic residence, religion, ability). This focus facilitates the design of personalized, culturally attuned aphasia intervention (Asher BlackDeer, 2023; Guerrero-Arias et al., 2020; Harris, 1997; Laures-Gore et al., 2018). Covering the transformative depth of an intersectional approach to clinical services is beyond the scope of a single journal issue (UN PRPD & UN Women, 2021). The articles in the current special issue provide an illustrative snapshot of the multiple factors and interactions in the intersectional profiles of PWAs that can inform the design, implementation, and outcome assessment of aphasia intervention. Because increasing ethnosocial diversity in aphasia services is a global phenomenon (Centeno et al., 2020; Centeno & Harris, 2021), the six articles in this issue, while highlighting service contexts in Australia and the United States as examples, discuss often overlooked, yet exceedingly important variables and intersectional connections relevant to ethnosocially diverse aphasia caseloads worl -Abstract Truncated-

Benefits and Challenges of Addressing Cultural Intersectionality for Program Development and Evaluation

Cultural considerations in interprofessional education and practice

Encompassing Cultural Contexts Within Scientific Research Methodologies in the Development of Health Promotion Interventions

Cultural Differences in Access to Care

Is cultural appropriateness culturally specific? Intersectional insights from a community‐based participatory mental health intervention study conducted with diverse cultural groups

Integrating intersectionality into child health research: Key considerations

Methods for analytic intercategorical intersectionality in quantitative research: Discrimination as a mediator of health inequalities

Intersectionality in Aphasia Services for Ethnosocially Diverse Adult Populations

Intention Versus Implementation: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice Efforts at Your Clinical Practice

Implementing and evaluating a culturally-focused curriculum in a collaborative graduate nursing program

Addressing racial equity in health psychology research: An application of the multicultural orientation framework.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Research: A Path Toward Precision Health for Everyone

Cultural Diversity Research on Learning and Development: Conceptual, Methodological, and Strategic Considerations

How does culture fit into de‐implementation? A scoping review of empirical research

An intersectionality framework for identifying relevant covariates in health equity research

Applying an intersectionality framework to health services research.

The Cultural Relevance of Community Support Programs

Integrating Diversity, Culture, and Equity into the Neuropsychological Evaluation

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Lessons From Developing Stroke Education Programs for West Michigan Asian Communities

Characteristics of interventions that address racism in the United States and opportunities to integrate equity principles: a scoping review

Incorporating Intersectionality in Neuropsychology: Moving the Discipline Forward