Abstract:Abstract Purpose There is a growing desire for health professions educators to engage learners in more meaningful instruction. Many have tapped Wikipedia to offer an applied approach to engage learners, particularly as it relates to evidence-based medicine (EBM). However, little is known about the benefits and challenges of using Wikipedia as a pedagogical tool from the collective experience of educators who have sought to improve their instructional practice with it. This study aims to uncover and synthesize the perspectives of health professions education (HPE) instructors who have incorporated Wikipedia in their HPE courses. Methods Applying a constructivist approach, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 participating HPE instructors who had substantively integrated Wikipedia into their curriculum. Participants were interviewed about their experiences of integrating Wikipedia editing into their courses. Thematic analysis was conducted on resulting transcripts. Results Authors observed two broad themes among participants’ expressed benefits of teaching with Wikipedia: 1) provides a meaningful instructional alternative that also benefits society and develops learners’ information literacy and EBM skills, and 2) supports learners’ careers and professional identity formation. Identified challenges included: 1) high effort and time, 2) issues with sourcing references, and 3) challenging interactions with skeptics, editors, and students. Discussion Findings build on known benefits, such as providing a real-world collaborative project that contextualizes students’ learning experiences. They also echo known challenges, such as the resource-intensive nature of teaching with Wikipedia. At the same time, findings extend the current literature by revealing a potential opportunity to approach crowd-sourced information tools, like Wikipedia, as a vehicle to engage and enculturate HPE students within a situated learning context. These findings present implications for HPE programs considering implementing Wikipedia and faculty development needed to help instructors harness crowd-sourced information tools’ pedagogical opportunities as well as anticipate their challenges.

Collaborative authoring using wiki

Scaffolding of Scientific Publications with Open Educational Resources (OER)

Using WebQuest As Scaffolding in the Wiki for Collaborative Learning

Dynamic learner engagement in a wiki-enhanced writing course

Investigating the Impact of Structured Knowledge Feedback on Collaborative Academic Writing

Using Wikis in Team Collaboration: A Media Capability Perspective

Attitudinal Factors Affecting Wiki Group Collaboration for English Writing

Enculturating a Community of Action (CoA): A qualitative study of health professions educators’ perspectives on teaching with Wikipedia

Co-creating with students to promote science of learning in higher education: An international pioneer collaborative effort for asynchronous teaching

Incentivizing Collaborative Learning Through Visual Feedback about Conflict in Wiki

Collaborative Structuring of Knowledge by Experts and the Public

Collaborative tasks in Wiki-based environment in EFL learning

College student engagement in OER design projects: Impacts on attitudes, motivation, and learning

Kickstarting creative collaboration: placing authentic feedback at the heart of online digital media education

Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing

Learning through Osmosis: A global Wikipedia editing course for medical students

Openness and Knowledge Co-creation on Wikis: the Moderating Role of Psychological Safety

Using Wikipedia Assignments to Teach Critical Thinking and Scientific Writing in STEM Courses

Investigating student use and value of e-learning resources to develop academic writing within the discipline of environmental science

Evaluation of Wikis Exploited for Medicine Courses Teaching

Co-Designing a wiki-based community knowledge management system for personal science