A Qualitative Case Study on the Implementation Experience of Curriculum Using Generative AI

Sungyeol You

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30916/kera.62.4.1

2024-06-30

Korean Educational Research Association

Abstract:This study conducted a qualitative case study on the experiences of four teachers using generative AI in their educational practices to explore the potential and limitations of its use in education. The research aimed to deeply understand the integration of generative AI in educational curricula and to analyze the outcomes and responses of learners to assess the impact of generative AI in educational settings. It then discusses implications for the educational use of generative AI. The study employed participant observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis to collect data. The findings clearly reveal both the potential and limitations of using generative AI in education. Generative AI was found to provide benefits, such as enhancing students’ creative expression, offering individualized and customized learning experiences, and improving access to educational resources. These advantages created new opportunities to enhance the quality of students’ educational experiences, aligning with their individual learning styles and paces. However, there were also significant limitations, including technical constraints, reduced teacher―student interaction, increased dependence on technology leading to constraints in expression, limited depth of learning, and decreased motivation. These limitations hindered the effective implementation of educational activities and restricted students’ opportunities for full engagement and growth in the learning process. Based on these results, the study emphasizes the crucial role of teachers as the primary designers and implementers of the curriculum in education that utilizes generative AI and underscored that generative AI should be viewed as a tool to support comprehensive learning and growth of students.