Abstract:Introduction. Urinary tract infections are common bacterial infections worldwide. Urine culture is the gold standard method to identify and quantify the presence or absence of bacteria in urine. Flow cytometry, which can differentiate and quantify multiple particles (including bacteria) in the urine, presents an alternative method for rapid screening to rule out bacteriuria. Hypothesis. Adding flow cytometry to identify urine samples without bacteriuria could substantially reduce the number of urine samples that need to be cultured as well as the response time for negative results. However, the level of instrument rinsing between samples could affect sample-to-sample carryover rate, a concept given little attention in previous studies. Aim. We aimed to evaluate urine flow cytometry as a rapid screening method to identify urine samples without significant bacterial growth, including analyses of cross-contamination and sample-to-sample carryover rate. Methodology. We analysed 3919 urine samples by quantitative urine culture and flow cytometry screening (Sysmex UF-5000). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to test method agreement to identify: (a) positive vs. negative culture and (b) mixed vs. pure culture. In addition, we performed carryover and cross-contamination studies. Results. ROC curve analyses identified bacterial count (BACT ml −1 ) and leucocyte count (WBC μl −1 ) as possible predictors of bacterial growth in the total material and subpopulations, except pregnant women ( n =451). This subgroup was excluded from further analyses, leaving a final 3468 urine samples. Area under the ROC curve was 0.94 (95 % CI 0.93–0.95) and 0.81 (95 % CI 0.79–0.82) for bacterial and leucocyte count, respectively. A bacterial count cut-off of 30 BACT ml −1 resulted in 95.2 % sensitivity and 91.2 % negative predictive value, resulting in approximately 30 % of urine samples that could be reported as negative without culture. Use of high-level rinse modes was necessary to ensure carryover rates <0.05 %. Conclusion. Flow cytometry is a suitable and rapid method to rule out urine samples without significant bacterial growth. Rinses between samples should be adjusted, depending on the cut-off used, to prevent sample-to-sample carryover, whereas cross-contamination can be eliminated by the use of separate urine aliquots for flow cytometry analysis and urine culturing respectively.

Enhancing clinical decision-making: Sysmex UF-5000 as a screening tool for bacterial urinary tract infection in children

Performance of the Sysmex UF-1000i Urine Analyser in the Rapid Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections in Hospitalized Patients.

Clinical Application of UF-1000i in Combination with AX-4280 for the Screening Test Ability of Urinary Formed Elements.

Accuracy of the Sysmex UF-5000 analyzer for urinary tract infection screening and pathogen classification

Using the Sysmex UF‐4000 urine flow cytometer for rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infection in the clinical microbiological laboratory

Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection.

The value of urine sediment analyzer in screening white blood cells and bacteria for urinary tractinfection

Urine flow cytometry is an adequate screening tool for urinary tract infections in children

Evaluation of Sysmex UF-500i Automated Urinary Sediment Analyzer in Screening Urinary Tract Infection

Use of Sysmex UF-5000 flow cytometry in rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infection and the importance of validating carryover rates against bacterial count cut-off

Investigating urinary characteristics and optimal urine white blood cell threshold in paediatric urinary tract infection: A prospective observational study

A novel approach to screening and managing the urinary tract infections suspected sample in the general human population

Evaluation of the bacterial count on a UF-100 automated urine analyzer for diagnosing urinary tract infection

Rapidly Discriminating Culture-Negative Urine Specimens from Patients with Suspected Urinary Tract Infections by UF-5000.

Application of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer for screening urinary tract infection

Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i System As an Alternative for the Screening of Genital Tract Inflammation in Male Infertility Patients

Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine sediment analyzer FUS200 in culture-positive urinary-tract infections

Evaluation of 3 different rapid automated systems for diagnosis of urinary tract infections

Accuracy of the Urinalysis for Urinary Tract Infections in Febrile Infants 60 Days and Younger

Rapid discrimination of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in liquid samples by using NaOH-sodium dodecyl sulfate solution and flow cytometry

Tests for Early Detection of Paediatric Urinary Tract Infection