CORR Insights®: Comparing Open and Arthroscopic Grafting for Scaphoid Nonunion: Is There Truly a Noticeable Difference?

Shafic Sraj
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000003207
IF: 4.755
2024-08-17
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Abstract:Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal bone injuries, and they are associated with a high risk of symptomatic nonunion when not treated in a timely fashion. They can subsequently progress into symptomatic arthritis if not addressed appropriately. Having said that, scaphoid nonunion management remains a challenge with no clear consensus on treatment. Surgical repair frequently relies on some form of bone grafting and fixation, which can be achieved through a variety of strategies that depend on surgeon experience and preferences, including open or arthroscopic approaches, free or vascularized bone grafts, a choice of fixation devices, various postoperative management protocols, and other considerations. Although open grafting offers direct visualization and has a long track record, surgeons who prefer arthroscopy appreciate the augmented ability to look beyond the fracture, to identify other ligamentous injuries that would otherwise be missed, and express concerns about the insult to the surrounding ligaments that threatens an already poor vascular supply. On the other hand, arthroscopic management is technically challenging and requires mastery of advanced arthroscopic techniques as well as the willingness to accept surgical times that generally are longer than would be needed with open approaches.
surgery,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?