Abstract:Aims:A new model of computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based algorithm for coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) (CT-FFR) analysis by expanding the coronary tree to smaller-diameter lumen (0.8 mm) using Newton-Krylov-Schwarz (NKS) method to solve the three-dimensional time-dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations has been developed; however, the diagnostic performance of this new method has not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of a novel CT-FFR technique by expanding the coronary tree in the CFD domain. Methods and results:Six centres enrolled 338 symptomatic patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) who prospectively underwent CCTA and FFR. Stenosis assessment in CCTA and CT-FFR analysis were performed in independent core laboratories. Haemodynamically significant stenosis was defined by a CT-FFR and FFR ≤ 0.80, and anatomically obstructive CAD was defined as a CCTA with stenosis ≥ 50%. Diagnostic performance of CT-FFR was evaluated against invasive FFR using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The correlation between CT-FFR and invasive FFR was analysed using the Spearman correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were evaluated utilizing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In this study, 338 patients with 422 targeted vessels were investigated, revealing haemodynamically significant stenosis in 31.1% (105/338) of patients and anatomically obstructive stenosis in 54.1% of patients. On a per-vessel basis, the area under the ROC curve for CT-FFR was 0.94 vs. 0.76 for CCTA (P < 0.001). Per-vessel accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 89.8%, 89.3%, 90.0%, 79.0%, and 99.2%, respectively, for CT-FFR and were 68.4%, 82.8%, 62.3%, 48.1%, and 89.6%, respectively, for CCTA stenosis. CT-FFR and FFR were well correlated (r = 0.775, P < 0.001) with a Bland-Altman bias of 0.0011, and limits of agreement from -0.1509 to 0.1531 (P = 0.770). The ICCs with CT-FFR for intro- and inter-observer agreements were 0.919 (95% CI: 0.866-0.952) and 0.909 (95% CI: 0.851-0.945), respectively. The average computation time for CT-FFR analysis was maintained at 11.7 min. Conclusion:This novel CT-FFR model with the inclusion of smaller lumen provides high diagnostic accuracy in detecting haemodynamically significant CAD. Furthermore, the integration of the NKS method ensures that the computation time remains within an acceptable range for potential clinical applications in the future.

Unsupervised physics-informed deep learning for assessing pulmonary artery hemodynamics

A Novel Physics-Based Model for Fast Computation of Blood Flow in Coronary Arteries

A comprehensive approach to prediction of fractional flow reserve from deep-learning-augmented model

LAFlowNet: A Dynamic Graph Method for the Prediction of Velocity and Pressure Fields in Left Atrium and Left Atrial Appendage

Diagnostic Performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd)-Based Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Derived from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) for Assessing Functional Severity of Coronary Lesions

Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Fractional Flow Reserve along the Coronary Artery

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for 4D hemodynamics prediction: An investigation of optimal framework based on vascular morphology

CT-FFR by Expanding Coronary Tree with Newton-Krylov-Schwarz Method to Solve the Governing Equations of CFD.

Learning physical properties in complex visual scenes: An intelligent machine for perceiving blood flow dynamics from static CT angiography imaging

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Uncovering near-wall blood flow from sparse data with physics-informed neural networks

Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived FFR for Coronary Lesion-Specific Ischemia Based on Deep Learning Analysis

Estimation of FFR in coronary arteries with deep learning

Constraint-Aware Learning for Fractional Flow Reserve Pullback Curve Estimation from Invasive Coronary Imaging

Non-invasive fractional flow reserve estimation using deep learning on intermediate left anterior descending coronary artery lesion angiography images

Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks to solve 1-D equations of blood flow

Voxel2Hemodynamics: An End-to-end Deep Learning Method for Predicting Coronary Artery Hemodynamics

Non-Invasive Quantification of Fraction Flow Reserve Based on Steady-State Geometric Multiscale Models

Noninvasive and fast method of calculation for instantaneous wave-free ratio based on haemodynamics and deep learning

Deep learning based assessment of hemodynamics in the coarctation of the aorta: comparison of bidirectional recurrent and convolutional neural networks

Physics-Guided Neural Networks for Intraventricular Vector Flow Mapping