Abstract:We investigated the potential of wildflower strips to modify plant‐pollinator networks. By comparing networks from wildflower strips and other agricultural field margin habitats, we found that increasing flower species richness significantly reduced network connectance, a measure of network complexity, and marginally reduced bee species' niche overlap, a proxy for insect competition. These findings are of general relevance in ecology and epidemiology, as we provide a new framework for the development of conservation measures where ecological interactions and network structure are taken into consideration beyond the current target of increasing species richness and abundance. Ecological restoration programs are established to reverse land degradation, mitigate biodiversity loss, and reinstate ecosystem services. Following recent agricultural intensification that led to a decrease in flower diversity and density in rural areas and subsequently to the decline of many insects, conservation measures targeted at pollinators have been established, including sown wildflower strips (WFS) along field margins. Historically successful in establishing a high density of generalist bees and increasing pollinator diversity, the impact of enhanced flower provision on wider ecological interactions and the structure of pollinator networks has been rarely investigated. Here, we tested the effects of increasing flower species richness and flower density in agricultural landscapes on bee‐plant interaction networks. We measured plant species richness and flower density and surveyed honeybee and bumblebee visits on flowers across a range of field margins on 10 UK farms that applied different pollinator conservation measures. We found that both flower species richness and flower density significantly increased bee abundance, in early and late summer, respectively. At the network level, we found that higher flower species richness did not significantly alter bee species' generality indices, but significantly reduced network connectance and marginally reduced niche overlap across honeybees and bumblebee species, a proxy for insect competition. While higher connectance and niche overlap is believed to strengthen network robustness and often is the aim for the restoration of pollinator networks, we argue that carefully designed WFS may benefit bees by partitioning their foraging niche, limiting competition for resources and the potential for disease transmission via shared floral use. We also discuss the need to extend WFS and their positive effects into spring when wild bee populations are established.

Native bee habitat restoration: key ecological considerations from recent North American literature

A review of the challenges and opportunities for restoring animal-mediated pollination of native plants

From marginal croplands to natural habitats: A methodological framework for assessing the restoration potential to enhance wild-bee pollination in agricultural landscapes

Bringing population ecology back to wild bees

A review of the habitat restoration of giant pandas from 2012 to 2021: Research topics and advances

Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition

Floral Resource Competition Between Honey Bees and Wild Bees: Is There Clear Evidence and Can We Guide Management and Conservation?

Nesting habitat of ground‐nesting bees: a review

Harnessing knowledge of animal behavior to improve habitat restoration outcomes

Harnessing community science to conserve and study ground-nesting bee aggregations

Bees in the city: Findings from a scoping review and recommendations for urban planning

Considering pollinators' ecosystem services in the remediation and restoration of contaminated lands: Overview of research and its gaps

Wild Bee Conservation within Urban Gardens and Nurseries: Effects of Local and Landscape Management

Local and Landscape Factors Influence Plant-Pollinator Networks and Bee Foraging Behavior across an Urban Corridor

Holistic wild bee management in urban spaces

A ‘Landscape physiology’ approach for assessing bee health highlights the benefits of floral landscape enrichment and semi-natural habitats

Improving wild bee monitoring, sampling methods, and conservation

One‐size does not fit all: at‐risk bumble bee habitat management requires species‐specific local and landscape considerations

Pollination reservoirs for wild bee habitat enhancement in cropping systems: a review

Local nesting resources rather than floral food alter ground-nesting bee communities in grazed habitats

Land use changes associated with declining honey bee health across temperate North America