Abstract:Background: Healthcare costs in most developed countries are not clearly linked to better patient and public health outcomes, but are rather associated with service delivery orientation. In the U.S. this has resulted in large variation in healthcare availability and use, increased cost, reduced employer participation in health insurance programs, and reduced overall population health outcomes. Recent U.S. healthcare reform legislation addresses only some of these issues. Other countries face similar healthcare issues. Discussion: A major goal of healthcare is to enhance patient health outcomes. This objective is not realized in many countries because incentives and structures are currently not aligned for maximizing population health. The misalignment occurs because of the competing interests between "actors" in healthcare. In a simplified model these are individuals motivated to enhance their own health; enterprises (including a mix of nonprofit, for profit and government providers, payers, and suppliers, etc.) motivated by profit, political, organizational and other forces; and government which often acts in the conflicting roles of a healthcare payer and provider in addition to its role as the representative and protector of the people. An imbalance exists between the actors, due to the resources and information control of the enterprise and government actors relative to the individual and the public. Failure to use effective preventive interventions is perhaps the best example of the misalignment of incentives. We consider the current Pareto efficient balance between the actors in relation to the Pareto frontier, and show that a significant change in the healthcare market requires major changes in the utilities of the enterprise and government actors. Summary: A variety of actions are necessary for maximizing population health within the constraints of available resources and the current balance between the actors. These actions include improved transparency of all aspects of medical decision making, greater involvement of patients in shared medical decision making, greater oversight of guideline development and coverage decisions, limitations on direct to consumer advertising, and the need for an enhanced role of the government as the public advocate.

Hospitals' marketing challenge: influencing physician behavior

Influencing physician practice patterns

Consumer product branding strategy and the marketing of physicians' services

How marketing mix (7Ps) affect the patients' selection of a hospital: experience of a low-income country

The health care market: can hospitals survive?

Using Behavioral Economics to Design Physician Incentives That Deliver High-Value Care

Marketing Technique in Healthcare Services: A Narrative Review

Influence of pharmaceutical marketing mix strategies on physicians’ prescribing behaviors in public and private hospitals, Dessie, Ethiopia: a mixed study design

Balancing influence between actors in healthcare decision making

Nurses' Perspectives on the Impact of Marketing Mix Elements (7Ps) on Patients' Tendency to Kind of Hospital

Do Hospitals Alter Patient Care Effort Allocations under Pay-for-Performance?

The Role of The Marketing Mix Factors in Hospital Selection

Results, Knowledge, and Attitudes Regarding an Incentive Compensation Plan in a Hospital-Based, Academic, Employed Physician Multispecialty Group

Integrated marketing communications: a strategic priority in health and medicine

Formulating productive marketing communications strategy: a major health system's experience

The Impact of the Marketing Mix on the Healthcare for Boosting Sales

Changes in physician and non-physician relationships

Emergency Physicians' Ethical Issues with Hospital Business Models

Virtual partnerships: aligning hospital and surgeon incentives

Advertising by academic medical centers

Marketing medicine