Effect of Plate–Bone Distance and Working Length on 2.0-mm Locking Construct Stiffness and Plate Strain in a Diaphyseal Fracture Gap Model: A Biomechanical Study
Alecia Evans,Mark Glyde,Rob Day,Giselle Hosgood
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771198
2023-07-22
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to determine the effect of plate–bone distance (PBD) and working length on 2.0-mm locking compression plate (LCP) stiffness and strain in four-point bending and torsion in a diaphyseal fracture gap model. Study Design A total of 54 LCP with three screws per fragment were assigned to one of nine combinations of working length (WL; short, medium, and long), and PBD (1, 1.5, and 3 mm) for a sample size of six per construct configuration. Stiffness was measured under quasistatic, nondestructive four-point compression bending and torsion. Plate surface strain was recorded using three-dimensional (3D) digital image correlation during four-point compression bending. Results WL had a significant effect on overall construct stiffness in both compression bending and in torsion, with shorter WL constructs having higher stiffness ( p < 0.0001). PBD had no effect on construct stiffness in compression bending; however, a significant reduction in stiffness was noted in torsion ( p = 0.047) as PBD incrementally increased. WL had a significant effect on plate strain in compression bending, with shorter WL constructs having lower plate strain ( p < 0.0001). PBD had no effect on plate strain in compression bending except for lower plate strain recorded in long WL constructs with 1-mm PBD, compared with 1.5- and 3-mm PBD constructs ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions Longer WL constructs, regardless of PBD, had lower stiffness in compression bending, while in torsion, some modulation of this effect was noted with incremental decreases in PBD. Longer WL resulted in high plate strain, regardless of PBD. A.E. and M.G. contributed to conception of the study, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation and review. R.D. contributed to study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation and review. G.H. contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation and review. All the authors revised and approved the submitted manuscript. Received: 16 March 2023 Accepted: 09 June 2023 Article published online: 20 July 2023 © 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
veterinary sciences,zoology