Abstract:In the current crisis period, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have provided a framework for new norms about governance of and access to external financing that emphasize stimulating investor interest and creating a suite of innovative instruments to address major development challenges. However, the inadequacies associated with extant financing streams are in sharp relief since they do not address damages and losses associated with the climate crisis. The current global configuration aimed at generating from “billions to trillions” of development finance are awfully mute on historical responsibility for the uneven and extreme consequences facing climate-impacted communities in the Global South. This paper interrogates the role of the SDGs, in particular SDG17, in both adducing financialisation as an evolutionary process, further extracting profit from racialized communities, and a source of instability in the global economy. It points to the manner in which the “trillions” deemed necessary are ostensibly mobilized in pursuit of financial returns to be made from climate disaster that generate further debt, dispossesses racialized populations in the global south, and thereby ushering in a new era of “bond-age” and coloniality. Current development financing arrangements under the SDGs would increase the cost burdens and compromise the Global South’s capacities to democratically manage and meet their developmental needs due to accumulating losses and damage from major extreme climate-induced events. Loss and damage compensation for marginalised developing countries at the forefront of the climate crisis must therefore come from another source: climate reparations. Climate reparations offer an appropriate encompassing philosophical and policy apparatus for first understanding the magnitude of climate breakdown, and second for mounting a response to ongoing environmental harm in vulnerable countries that is centred on climate justice.

Global North–South Reparations: Demand‐side and Supply‐side Policies with a Dynamic View of International Trade and Finance

Global Reparations within Capitalism: Aspirations and Tensions in Contemporary Movements for Reparatory Justice

How Promising is South-South Trade as a Contributor to Economic Development in Asia and South America? Insights from Estimating Income Elasticities of Import Demand

The paradox of international reparations

Global imbalances and a trade‐finance‐nexus

The New ‘Bond-Age’, Climate Crisis and the Case for Climate Reparations: Unpicking Old/New Colonialities of Finance for Development Within the SDGs

Global directed technical change model with fiscal and monetary policies, and public debt

A note on redistributive fairness and economic reform

A New Economic Geography of Trade and Development? Governing South–South Trade, Value Chains and Production Networks

International monetary fund conditionality and structural reforms: Evidence from developing countries

Unequal exchange of labour in the world economy

From the Great Divergence to South–South Divergence: New comparative horizons in global economic history

International inequality and demand for redistribution in the Global South

Economic Performance Through Time: A Dynamical Theory

Trade Reforms and Current Account Imbalances: when Does the General Equilibrium Effect Overturn a Partial Equilibrium Intuition?

Prebisch and the terms of trade

Equilibrium parallel import policies and international market structure

Methodological Approaches to Structural Change: Epidemiology and the Case for Reparations

Fixing the collective action problem in sovereign debt restructuring: significance of Global South solidarity

North–South trade, technology diffusion, and uneven development

Combining distributive ethics and causal Inference to make trade-offs between austerity and population health