Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To analyze the risk factors of carcinogenesis of large colorectal polyps (diameter ≥ 10 mm) found by colonoscopy.METHODS:Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 418 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as colorectal polyps with diameter≥10 mm by colonoscopy at two endoscopy centers of the Affiliated Wuxi Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University (n=207) and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (n=211) from January 2015 to December 2016 were retrospectively collected. High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer were defined as malignancy in this study. Chi square test was used for univariate analysis, and logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis (in patients with multiple polyps, if the pathological findings were all low grade intraepithelial neoplasia, one polyp with the largest diameter was selected to enter the model; in patients with high grade intraepithelial neoplasia, one polyp of high grade intraepithelial neoplasia with the largest diameter was selected to enter the model). Associated risk factors of malignancy were analyzed.RESULTS:Among the 418 patients, 278(66.5%) were male and 140(33.5%) were female, with mean age of (58.7±10.2) (range 15-87) years old. Of 398 patients undergoing endoscopic treatment with resected 456 polyps, 142 cases with 150 polyps were malignant, including 134 polyps of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and 16 polyps of intra-mucosal cancer. The other 20 patients showed negative elevation signs after endoscopic submucosal injection and were transferred to surgery, of whom 20 polyps were resected. Histological examination of these 20 polyps indicated invasive cancer. Univariate analysis showed that age ≥ 50 years [40.5% (150/370) vs. 25.0% (12/48), χ² =4.323, P=0.041], multiple polyps [77.5%(31/40) vs. 34.7%(131/378), χ² =12.900, P=0.001], polyp locating at rectum [59.0%(36/61) vs. 32.3%(134/415), χ² =22.736, P=0.000], polyp diameter ≥31 mm [74.1%(20/27) vs. 33.4%(150/449), χ² =36.493, P=0.000] and tubular villous adenoma [67.4%(120/178) vs. 16.8%(50/298), χ² =71.810, P=0.000] were associated with malignancy. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 50 years(OR=2.473, 95%CI:1.209-5.058, P=0.013), multiple polyps (OR=2.472, 95%CI: 1.300-4.702, P=0.006), polyp locating at rectum (OR=1.253, 95%CI: 1.091-1.439, P=0.001) and the polyp diameter ≥31 mm (OR=1.500, 95%CI:1.196-1.881, P=0.000) were independent risk factors for malignancy of large colorectal polyps. The mean follow-up time was (9.6±4.2) months. During the follow-up period, 86 patients (20.5%) who received endoscopic resection developed recurrent adenoma which all were successfully removed by colonoscopic polypectomy. Two patients(0.5%) developed colon cancer 6 months after endoscopic resection and both underwent radical surgery and chemotherapy. Their previous pathology from endoscopic resection was tubular villous adenoma and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia. All the patients were alive during the follow-up period.CONCLUSIONS:Age ≥50 years old, multiple polyps, polyps locating at rectum and polyps with diameter ≥ 31 mm are the risk factors of malignancy. Emphasized examination should be recommended for those with the above mentioned risk factors to avoid missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. The choice of endoscopic treatment must be reasonable for curative resection.

Polyp size is associated with colorectal cancer death across histologic polyp subtypes: a retrospective study of a screening colonoscopy registry

Comparison of adenoma detection rate and proximal serrated polyp detection rate and their effect on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality in screening patients

Colonoscopy and polypectomy: beside age, size of polyps main factor for long-term risk of colorectal cancer in a screening population

High risk features in colorectal adenomatous polyps: A multi-institutional study

Diminutive polyps among black and Latino populations undergoing screening colonoscopy: evidence supporting a resect and discard approach

Mortality from upper gastrointestinal tumors in colorectal cancer screening patients

Growth rates and histopathological outcomes of small (6–9 mm) colorectal polyps based on CT colonography surveillance and endoscopic removal

The absolute number of small and diminutive adenomas with high-grade dysplasia is substantially higher compared with large adenomas: a retrospective pooled study

Association between baseline hyperplastic polyps and metachronous serrated lesions

Risk Analysis of the Canceration of Colorectal Large Polyps

Prevalence of diverse colorectal polyps and risk factors for colorectal carcinoma in situ and neoplastic polyps

Polypectomy versus surgery in early colon cancer: size and location of colon cancer affect long-term survival

Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Removal of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps

Patients with small and diminutive proximal hyperplastic polyps have higher rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia compared with patients without serrated lesions

Diminutive Polyps With Advanced Histologic Features Do Not Increase Risk for Metachronous Advanced Colon Neoplasia

Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy

Risk Factors Related to Polyp Miss Rate of Short-Term Repeated Colonoscopy

Association of Helicobacter pylori infection with colorectal polyps/adenomas: A single-center cross-sectional study

Measurement of colorectal polyp size: End of a long-running story?

Abstract 1827: Height, Obesity and Colorectal Adenomatous Polyps: the Minnesota Cancer Prevention Research Unit Case-Control Study

Endoscopic Management of Large (≥2 cm) Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Impact of Polyp Morphology on Outcomes