New Rules for Innocent Spouse Equitable Relief: Recent IRS Revenue Procedure Gives More Weight to Economic Hardship and Abuse
Wei-Chih Chiang,Rachana Kalelkar,Xiaobo Dong
2014-01-01
Abstract:[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, RL. 105-206, expanded spouse relief into three categories: Sec. 6015(b) traditional spouse relief; Sec. 6015(c) allocation of liability; and Sec. 6015(f) equitable relief. Since then, the IRS has received tens of thousands of spouse relief requests annually. The National Taxpayer Advocate has consistently reported that spouse claims are among the most serious problems faced by taxpayers, and spouse relief has been one of the 10 most-litigated tax issues in the past decade. Sec. 6015(f) equitable relief serves as the last resort for taxpayers who do not qualify for Sec. 6015(b) or (c) relief. However, Sec. 6015(f) itself gives no specific guidelines for determining when equitable relief should be granted, stating only that under procedures it prescribes, the IRS can grant relief when it would be inequitable to hold an individual liable for all or part of an unpaid tax or deficiency, taking into account all the facts and circumstances. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] The IRS has provided specific guidance in a series of revenue procedures for determining whether a taxpayer qualifies for Sec. 6015(f) equitable relief and the procedures and rules for applying for it. The most recent of these is Rev. Proc. 2013-34, which the IRS issued in September 2013 after issuing it in proposed form as Notice 2012-8 in January 2012. While this revenue procedure is similar in many ways to its predecessor, Rev. Proc. 2003-61, it changes the way the IRS will treat a number of important factors in its analysis of taxpayers' claims, including how the IRS will weigh economic hardship and the presence of abuse. Rev. Proc. 2013-34 also differs from Rev. Proc. 2003-61 in that it no longer asserts a limitation period of two years after the date of the IRS's first collection activity with respect to the taxpayer for filing a claim for equitable relief; however, the IRS had formally abandoned this position in 2011 in Notice 2011-70. RELIEF FROM JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY When signing a joint tax return, a married couple become jointly and severally liable for the entire tax associated with that return. In some situations, joint and severable liability could be considered extremely unfair to one of the spouses. For example, embezzled funds are includible in gross income (James, 366 U.S. 213 (1961)). Even if a spouse does not know of the other spouse's unreported embezzled money, the innocent spouse is still separately responsible for the tax liability To redress this unfairness, Congress implemented the spouse relief provisions under Sec. 6015, which allows an spouse (the requesting spouse) to request three types of relief. Sec. 6015(b) offers relief from understatements of tax attributable to erroneous items of the other, or nonrequesting, spouse that the spouse, upon signing the return, did not know about and had no reason to know, where it would be inequitable to hold the spouse liable for the resulting deficiency Sec. 6015(c) provides an election that allows a qualifying spouse to limit his or her liability for a deficiency from a joint return to the spouse's allocable portion of the deficiency. Under Sec. 6015(f), where the spouse does not qualify for relief under Sec. 6015(b) or (c), the IRS can grant equitable relief if, under the facts and circumstances, it would be inequitable to hold the spouse responsible for the tax liability. To provide guidance on Sec. 6015(f) equitable relief, the IRS issued Rev. Proc. 2000-15, which was superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-61, which in turn was superseded by Rev. Proc. 2013-34. The latest guidance, while it makes a number of significant changes, follows the same general framework of prescribing seven threshold conditions for an equitable relief request. Once those conditions are met, the IRS can make a streamlined determination of equitable relief based on three factors (described below). …