Abstract:The purpose of this paper is a multifaceted theoretical and legal analysis of the issue of determining the tax capacity of entrepreneurs in income taxes so as to be able to assess the adequacy of the rules in this area for the proper implementation of this concept. The research hypothesis assumes that these rules currently in force, to a large extent, do not ensure proper implementation of the concept of tax capacity, especially in the conditions of the digitalized and globalized economy, but also in times of progressive development of instruments to counteract not only tax evasion but also tax avoidance. Therefore, it is necessary to change them in many aspects. The research was carried out using a dogmatic and comparative legal method, taking into account in particular the provisions of domestic, foreign and EU laws, the body of domestic and foreign tax law literature, court rulings and proposals for new tax and legal solutions put forward on the EU and international forum. The analysis took into account the essence of the tax capacity concept and closely related tax principles, as well as the functions of taxes, both in the national and international context. The results of the research is the formulation of some conclusions as to the desirable guidelines for determining the rules for measuring the tax capacity of entrepreneurs in income taxes, which should be related to the fundamental concept of tax capacity and the principles of equity and neutrality of taxation. Currently, these principles are violated in many national, as well as international aspects, i.a. by deviating from the criteria of income as an indicator of tax capacity. In this context a very important distinction should be made between situations where the abandoning of the determination of income of entrepreneurs is justified by the pursuit of a fair distribution of the tax burden (as, e.g., in case of so-called digital tax) and situations when it results from the desire to achieve certain non-fiscal goals. In such a case, any variation in those rules must be assessed on a case-by-case basis as to whether it is justified. On the other hand, in the former case, even temporarily – especially in the international aspect – until international solutions are worked out, it may even be indispensable to differentiate the rules for determining the tax capacity of entrepreneurs (e.g. abandoning the criterion of income in favor of revenue in digital tax) precisely in order to ensure fair and neutral taxation. In this context, it is worth noting that some of the problems underlying these different approaches may be solved by a comprehensive reform of the rules for determining the tax capacity of entrepreneurs, to be developed both internationally within the OECD and in the EU within BEFIT. It should also not be underestimated that in these projects the fundamental categories and concepts are those of balance sheet law, including in particular the proposed adoption of the concept of adjusted financial result for the purposes of determining the tax result. Taking into account this issue and also in a view of the increasing development of general tax law norms aimed at minimizing the phenomena of tax avoidance and optimization, it seems worth considering an increasing possibility that the tax capacity of entrepreneurs should be determined by its natural measure, i.e. the financial result of their business activity.

Taxation Rules for Alternative Investment Companies

The real estate clause in the OECD model tax convention and its reception into Polish law

Taxation models for international groups of companies

Investment and Financing Strategy of a Multinational Enterprise Under Alternative Tax Designs

Is the Polish Inheritance and Gift Tax Incompatible with the Free Movement of Capital in Relation to Third Countries?

TAXATION OF INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITY IN EUROPE: CASE STUDY OF POLAND, LITHUANIA, UKRAINE

Controlled foreign companies (CFC/КІК): concept and principles of taxation

Intellectual Property Income as “Per Se” Passive Income: A Comparative Analysis of Controlled Foreign Company Rules in the European Union before and after the Implementation of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (2016/1164)

Impact of Changing Preferential Tax Rate Conditions on Czech Real Estate Investment Funds

Tax risks sources and consequences as a part of intercultural management at family companies

METHODS OF PREVENTING DOUBLE TAXATION IN THE AREA OF PERSONAL INCOME TAXATION INCLUDING THE RULES OF FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS

Article: Economic Substance for Holding Companies in the Post- BEPS World and after Recent ECJ Case-Law: An Analysis of Developments in Europe

Transforming a sole proprietorship into a limited liability company – selected tax aspects

ADR in tax disputes in Poland – the state of play and perspectives

Consolidated financial statements and global tax policy (OECD BEPS) insights from a multijurisdictional case study

Legal Aspects of Taxation of Offshore Wind Farms in Poland

ACCOUNTING OF REGISTERED CAPITAL IN ENTERPRISES WITH FOREIGN INVESTMENTS

Principles and Rules for Determining the Tax Capacity of Entrepreneurs in Income Taxes

Tax avoidance, anti-abuse clauses and arbitration courts: a note on capital gains’ exemption

Preventive Anti-Takeover Defences in Polish Law

Personal Tax Planning: Getting a GRIP on New Passive Investment Rules and Integration