Using case management to improve claims payment

J A Micheletti,S Mevert,T J Shlala

Abstract:Payers increasingly are subjecting claims to intensive review in an attempt to control amounts paid for healthcare services. An internal case management program, however, can help providers better understand and respond to the review techniques employed by payers as well as streamline overall claims processing.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Case management's value is finally recognized. What happens now?

Abstract:In recent years, case management has been recognized as a key in improving healthcare quality and reducing costs, but while hospitals are giving case managers more responsibilities, many administrators are not approving an increase in staff to handle the extra work. Case managers can help their hospital succeed with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Value-based Purchasing program, the readmission reduction program, and bundled payments. Case management directors should make sure the hospital's senior leadership understands the roles and responsibilities of case managers and how their interventions can affect outcomes and the bottom line. The number of caseloads depends on the case management model, the responsibilities of case managers, and whether they have assistants or case management extenders who can take over some tasks and allow the licensed staff to work at the top of their licenses. Don't let technology replace communication and patient-centered interactions.
Value-Based Integrated Case Management at Payor Level: Implementation and Impact

Matthew Martin,Yash Suri,Bradley Doebbeling,Rachel Andrew,Roger Kathol

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000572

Abstract:Purpose of study: Case management is an ideal service for patients with health complexity. However, most case management models do not integrate medical and behavioral health training and interventions, and there are little data evaluating these models in privately insured populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate impact of an integrated case management (ICM) service at the payor level. Primary practice setting: Health care insurance company. Methodology and sample: A multimethod observational study was conducted at a health care insurance company in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. We conducted focus groups of case managers, leaders, and administrators and statistical analyses of outcomes data. Measures included care quality data (discharge follow-up appointment, cost per case, depression and anxiety measures, customer experience and satisfaction, and audit scores) of members receiving ICM services and employee focus group data (acceptability, adoption, feasibility, appropriateness, fidelity, and sustainability) related to the practice of ICM. Results: Care quality data suggest ICM reduces mental health symptoms and increases discharge follow-up appointments for members. Implementation challenges include new employee orientation to ICM model, traditional views of case management, performance evaluation, documentation, and information technology. Facilitators of implementation include training, autonomy, and leadership support. Implications for case management practice: Organizations should be aware both of the benefits and challenges related to implementing ICM. Open communication between case managers and leadership and an improvement-focused culture appear to be important elements of implementation success. Future research should examine the perspective of members receiving ICM services and the implementation of ICM into health care delivery systems.
Exposing Impediments to Insurance Claims Processing.

Robert Andrews,Moe Wynn,Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede,Jingxin Xu,Kylie Horton,Paul Taylor,Sue Plunkett-Cole

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58307-5_15

2018-01-01

Abstract:(a)Situation faced: Processing injury-compensation claims, such as compulsory third party (CTP) claims, is complex, as it involves negotiations among multiple parties (e.g., claimants, insurers, law firms, health providers). Queensland’s CTP program is regulated by the Motor Accident Insurance Commission (MAIC). The Nominal Defendant, an arm of MAIC, determines liability for claims when the vehicle “at fault” is unregistered or unidentified and manages such claims from injured persons. While the relevant legislation mandates milestones for claims processing, the Nominal Defendant sees significant behavioral and performance variations in CTP claims processing, affecting the costs and durations of claims. The reasons for these variations are poorly understood.(b)Action taken: The BPM initiative took a process-mining approach that focused on the process identification, discovery, and analysis phases of the BPM Lifecycle. We undertook automated process discovery and comparative performance analysis with the aim of identifying where claims processing across cohorts of interest to the Nominal Defendant differed. In parallel, we conducted a context analysis with the aim of identifying the context factors that affect claim duration and cost. The personal injury literature and interviews with representative Nominal Defendant staff informed our selection of data attributes.(c)Results achieved: Process models were developed to facilitate comparative visualization of processes. The Nominal Defendant was particularly interested in differences in the processes for specific cohorts of claims: (i) overall claims, (ii) claims involving unregistered vehicles versus unidentified vehicles, and (iii) direct claims versus legally represented claims. The model facilitated identification of aspects of claims processing where there were significant differences between cohorts. Data mining/feature selection techniques identified a set of process-related context factors affecting claim duration and cost. Models utilizing these context factors were able to distinguish between cases with short and long durations with 68% accuracy and between low-cost and high-cost claims with 83% accuracy.(d)Lessons learned: This multi-faceted process-mining study presented many challenges and opportunities for refining our process-mining methodology and toolset. Data-related challenges arose because of the replacement of claims-management software during the study. Legislative changes, changes to key personnel, and the semi-structured nature of CTP claims-processing introduced issues related to concept drift. Each of these issues affected process discovery, but close collaboration with the stakeholders proved valuable in addressing these issues. Novel visualization techniques were developed to support delivery of insights gained through comparative analysis that will guide process improvement. Consideration of context considerably broadens the scope of process mining and facilitates reasoning about process specifics.
The paradox of case management

F J Halamandaris

Abstract:In attempting to contain costs, case management, as it is often conducted, negatively impacts the quality of patient care. In many instances this is because the clinical aspect of case management is performed by personnel lacking in clinical experience. Over the next few years federal and state legislators will be looking at the issue of case management and who provides it. Many groups will be putting in their bid. The home care community must be prepared to fight, support, or activate its own case management program.
Navigating payment pitfalls in managed care

Bill Phillips

Abstract:Healthcare providers need to identify and address payment problems relating to denied or underpaid claims. Before contract renegotiation, providers should identify the total dollar amount of claims that are denied or underpaid for each payer. Providers should choose managed care contract information systems that can grow with the hospital's managed care volume. Providers should identify all underpayment problems before negotiating a settlement with a payer.
An Effective Program to Reduce Malpractice Claims and Payments in a Large Orthopaedic Practice

William O. Cooper,Thomas W. Doub,Gerald B. Hickson,Virginia F. Casey,Damian F. McHugh,Peter Nonken,Thomas F. Catron,Henry J. Domenico,James W. Pichert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.23.00973

2024-04-25

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Abstract:Background: High reliability in health care requires a balance between intentionally designed systems and individual professional accountability. One element of accountability includes a process for addressing clinicians whose practices are associated with a disproportionate share of patient complaints. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Patient Advocacy Reporting System (PARS), a tiered intervention model to reduce patient complaints about clinicians. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving a southeastern U.S. orthopaedic group practice. The study assessed the implementation of the PARS program and subsequent malpractice claims from 2004 to 2020. Results: The implementation of PARS was associated with an 83% reduction in malpractice claims cost per high-risk clinician after intervention (p = 0.05; Wilcoxon rank sum test). The overall practice group experienced an 87% reduction in mean annual claims cost per clinician (p = 0.007; segmented regression). The successful adoption required essential elements such as PARS champions, peer messengers, an Office of Patient Affairs, and a clear statement of practice values and professionalism expectations at the time of onboarding. Conclusions: The PARS program was successfully adopted within a surgical specialty group as a part of ongoing risk prevention and management efforts. The period following PARS was associated with a retrospectively measured reduction in malpractice claim costs. The PARS program can be effectively implemented in a large, single-specialty orthopaedic practice setting and, although not necessarily causal, was, in our case, associated with a period of reduced malpractice claim costs. Clinical Relevance: We have learned in previous research that there are clear links between professionalism and patient outcomes (e.g., surgical complications), but agree that the focus here on medical malpractice is not directly clinical.

surgery,orthopedics
The Case for Capitation

Brent C James,Gregory P Poulsen

Abstract:Recent studies suggest that at least 35%--and maybe over 5o%--of all health care spending in the U.S. is wasted on inadequate, unnecessary, and inefficient care and suboptimal business processes. But efforts to get rid of that waste face a huge challenge: Under current payment methods, the providers who develop more-cost-effective approaches don't receive any of the savings. Instead, the money goes mainly to insurers. The providers, who are paid for the volume of services delivered, end up actually losing money, which undermines their finances and their ability to invest in more cost-saving innovations. To address this quandary, say two top execs from the nonprofit Intermountain Healthcare system, we need a different way to pay for health care: population-based payment. PBP gives care delivery groups a fixed per-person payment that covers all of an individual's health care services in a given year. Under it, providers benefit from the savings of all efforts to attack waste, encouraging them to do it more. And though PBP may sound similar to the HMOs of the 1990s, there are significant twists: Payments go directly to care delivery groups, and patients' physicians--not insurance companies--assume responsibility for overseeing and managing the cost of treatment. Provider groups are also required to meet quality standards that further protect patients. By applying PBP in just part of its system, Intermountain, which serves 2 million people, has been able to chop $688 million in annual waste and bring total costs down 13%.
Evaluating a Care Management Program for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries: Evidence from Rhode Island

Emma L Tucher,John P McHugh,Kali S Thomas,Anya R Wallack,David J Meyers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2022.0236

Abstract:As health systems attempt to contain utilization and costs, care management programs are proliferating. However, there are mixed findings on their impact. In 2018, Rhode Island initiated a care management program for dually eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries at high risk of hospitalization or institutionalization. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between health care utilization and costs and care management for dual-eligible participants (n = 169). The authors employed an interrupted time series analysis of administrative claims data using the Rhode Island All Payer Claims Database, which includes data from all major payers in the state, for 11 quarters (January 1, 2017 until September 1, 2019). On average, participants were younger (46.2% were 19-64 years of age vs. 41.9% of non-participants), female (71% vs. 62.6% of non-participants), and had a higher comorbidity burden (more commonly had anemia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and stroke). Participation was associated with significantly fewer hospital admissions (118 fewer admissions per 1000 admissions per quarter; 95% confidence interval [CI] -11 to -22), and a reduction in Medicaid ($1841 less spent per quarter, 95% CI -2407 to -1275) and total ($2570 less spent per quarter; 95% CI -$4645 to -$495) costs. Participation was not significantly associated with a change in Emergency Department (ED) visits, preventable ED visits, Skilled Nursing Facility stays, or Medicare costs. These results suggest that targeted care management programs may provide dual-eligible beneficiaries with needed services while diverting inefficient health care utilization.
Case management and patient safety: opportunities for process and performance improvement

Sherrie Dulworth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.casemgr.2005.04.003

Abstract:Awareness and activities about patient safety and the need for improvement are wide-spread within the health care industry, but the role and the expectation for case management in this area has not yet been well defined. Some case managers voice doubts about the ability to affect safety because they typically are not direct caregivers. Is it realistic to expect case managers and their organizations to influence and improve patient safety?
Chronic care management: An opportunity to drive quality outcomes in oncology care.

Amanda Pate,Carolyn Lammersfeld,Katherine Anderson,Maurie Markman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2023.19.11_suppl.444

2023-11-01

JCO Oncology Practice

Abstract:444 Background: CMS approved Chronic (CCM) and Principal Care Management (PCM) to improve patient care. These services are typically non-face-to-face; providers can bill ≥ twenty minutes /month. In oncology, this may help with comorbidity and symptom management to reduce the risk and expense of avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits and pay providers for time spent. In 2021, a system of community cancer centers initiated a program with a partner to manage chronic conditions more effectively at home. Approximately three hundred people were enrolled. A review of the data found that patients did not meet the medical criteria for the program, and care was not billable. An internal program was created to improve the enrollment process and financial sustainability. A clinical needs assessment was completed with our oncologists, outlining revised criteria for patient enrollment. Qualified patients were enrolled by their attending oncologist during the initial face-to-face visit and assigned a dedicated RN. Methods: Three hundred unenrolled, actively treating patients were randomly selected from January 2023 to May 2023 by a group of data analysts not associated with the program to be compared to enrolled patients who have been enrolled on average six months. Patients were compared by age, gender, cancer type, and race. The LACE Index for Readmission, a validated tool using the length of stay, acuity of admission, comorbidities, and ER visits to predict the risk of readmission, was done retrospectively by RNs for all patients. Enrolled patients received a comprehensive clinical needs assessment by RNs, and a provider-approved care plan was created. RNs provided patients with education on lifestyle modification and assisted in setting achievable goals. The care plan was monitored with weekly calls, providing the opportunity to respond to patients’ needs proactively. Symptom and medication management were provided, and psychological and nutritional needs were addressed. This coordination of services was documented in the electronic health record, and superbills were created and sent to billing and coding monthly. Results: See table. Conclusions: The purpose of this study was to compare hospital admissions between the groups. Our findings suggest that CCM and PCM may reduce unplanned admissions, with physician engagement pivotal in driving appropriate enrollment. The current program is labor-intensive and further investigation is required to determine the most cost-effective way of scaling the program with the possible use of artificial intelligence, RPM, or other technology.[Table: see text]

oncology
Ten Years’ Experience Using an Integrated Workers’ Compensation Management System to Control Workers’ Compensation Costs

Edward J. Bernacki,Shan P. Tsai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000063629.37065.0c

2003-05-01

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract:This work presents 10 years of experience using an Integrated Workers' Compensation Claims Management System that allows safety professionals, adjusters, and selected medical and nursing providers to collaborate in a process of preventing accidents and expeditiously assessing, treating, and returning individuals to productive work. The hallmarks of the program involve patient advocacy and customer service, steerage of injured employees to a small network of physicians, close follow-up, and the continuous dialogue between parties regarding claims management. The integrated claims management system was instituted in fiscal year 1992 servicing a population of approximately 21,000 individuals. The system was periodically refined and by the 2002 fiscal year, 39,000 individuals were managed under this paradigm. The frequency of lost-time and medical claims rate decreased 73% (from 22 per 1000 employees to 6) and 61% (from 155 per 1000 employees to 61), respectively, between fiscal year 1992 and fiscal year 2002. The number of temporary/total days paid per 100 insureds decreased from 163 in fiscal year 1992 to 37 in fiscal year 2002, or 77%. Total workers' compensation expenses including all medical, indemnity and administrative, decreased from $0.81 per $100 of payroll in fiscal year 1992 to $0.37 per $100 of payroll in fiscal year 2002, a 54% decrease. More specifically, medical costs per $100 of payroll decreased 44% (from $0.27 to $0.15), temporary/total, 61% (from $0.18 to $0.07), permanent/partial, 63% (from $0.19 to $0.07) and administrative costs, 48% ($0.16 to $0.09). These data suggests that workers' compensation costs can be reduced over a multi-year period by using a small network of clinically skilled health care providers who address an individual workers' psychological, as well as physical needs and where communication between all parties (e.g., medical care providers, supervisors, and injured employees) is constantly maintained. Furthermore, these results can be obtained in an environment in which the employer pays the full cost of medical care and the claimant has free choice of medical provider at all times.

public, environmental & occupational health
High-risk population health management--achieving improved patient outcomes and near-term financial results

J P Lynch,S A Forman,S Graff,M C Gunby

Abstract:Objective: A managed care organization sought to achieve efficiencies in care delivery and cost savings by anticipating and better caring for its frail and least stable members. Study design: Time sequence case study of program intervention across an entire managed care population in its first year compared with the prior baseline year. Patients and methods: Key attributes of the intervention included predictive registries of at-risk members based on existing data, relentless focus on the high-risk group, an integrated clinical and psychosocial approach to assessments and are planning, a reengineered care management process, secured Internet applications enabling rapid implementation and broad connectivity, and population-based outcomes metrics derived from widely used measures of resource utilization and functional status. Results: Concentrating on the highest-risk group, which averaged just 1.1% prevalence in the total membership, yielded bottom line results. When the year before program implementation (July 1997 through June 1998) was compared with the subsequent year, the total population's annualized commercial admission rate was reduced 5.3%, and seniors' was reduced 3.0%. A claims-paid analysis exclusively of the highest-risk group revealed that their efficiencies and savings overwhelmingly contributed to the membershipwide effect. This subgroup's costs dropped 35.7% from preprogram levels of $2590 per member per month (excluding pharmaceuticals). During the same time, patient-derived cross-sectional functional status rose 12.5%. Conclusions: A sharply focused, Internet-deployed case management strategy achieved economic and functional status results on a population basis and produced systemwide savings in its first year of implementation.
Participatory risk management: promoting physician compliance with practice guidelines

G O Thomasson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30076-1

Abstract:Background: Claims that result from at-risk medical practices, especially those involving medical records and systems failure-related problems, cost significantly more than the average claim to resolve, primarily due to additional defense costs required for expert witnesses. An analysis of these claims areas has pinpointed specific problems that can be addressed and corrected. Obtaining physician participation in risk management: A participatory risk management program requires all physicians applying for insurance to comply with established general and specialty-specific practice guidelines. Additionally, physicians and their staff receive premium-credit points by attending regularly scheduled continuing education programs on reducing liability risk. If a claim arises in which there is some question about whether the physician followed the guidelines, the circumstances are thoroughly reviewed with the physician after defense of the claim has been completed. Additionally, a medical records consultation program helps individual practices audit their records and identify and correct any at-risk problems. Rewarding participating physicians: Based on the success of the program, a new premium program has been instituted in which all physicians are placed in the lowest premium group, but they must participate regularly in risk management activities and avoid adverse actions to maintain the low premium rate.
Applying AI to Care Management and Claims Processing

Sean Harrison,Melissa Leigh,Daniel Hallenbeck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/001c.120569

Abstract:This article explores the current and potential applications of AI in care management and health care administration through the experience of Acentra Health. By discussing various AI use cases, this paper highlights how AI can augment the capabilities of healthcare professionals and streamline operations. Ethical considerations, legal compliance, and the future implications of AI in the health care sector are also examined.
The Impact of Case Management on Reducing Readmission for Patients Diagnosed With Heart Failure and Diabetes

Khalilah M McCants,Kathryn B Reid,Ishan Williams,D Elise Miller,Richard Rubin,Suzanne Dutton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000359

Abstract:Purpose of the study: To determine the impact of integrated case management services versus treatment as usual (TAU) for patients diagnosed with diabetes and concomitant heart failure. Primary setting: This medical chart review was conducted at a single-site facility. The retrospective study design can be implemented at other facilities with a similar landscape. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, comparative analysis of integrated case management services compared with TAU from a medical chart review of 68 patients from September 1, 2015, through July 31, 2017. A medical chart review was conducted to generate the study sample for data collection and analysis. The data were organized, cleaned, and prepared and then analyzed. The data were analyzed using SPSS and verified with SAS and R. Applied were descriptive statistics and statistical tests-t test, χ test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Logistic Regression. Results: For the integrated case management group, there were 18.4% who readmitted whereas 81.6% did not. For the TAU group, there were 52.6% who readmitted and 47.4% who did not. The association between readmission and case management was χ (1, n = 68) = 6.372, p = .012. Nursing implications: Integrated case management services were statistically significant in reducing readmission for the sample. Demographics tested in this study were not significant predictors for readmission. Extending length of stay for patients who are not medically ready for discharge should be considered because there is a cost difference, as there is evidence of readmission reduction. Policy and procedural amendments can be obtained from this study.
Harnessing the power of medical malpractice data to improve patient care

Dana Siegal,John Swift,Janell Forget,Tim Slowick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21393

Abstract:Intelligence gleaned from medical malpractice cases helps health care institutions analyze their litigation practices, trend financial outcomes, and even identify clinical services needing attention. But when examined more deeply, medical malpractice data can also be a powerful patient safety tool by revealing clinical patterns that contribute to medical errors and by enabling leadership to more accurately plan investments in patient safety and risk management. This case study describes how one organization, UMass Memorial Health Care in Worcester, Massachusetts, harnesses its deeply coded medical malpractice data and benchmarks its performance against national peers to catalyze clinical improvements. This strategy has proven successful in yielding positive change in such areas as emergency department ultrasound coverage, obstetrics communication, and airway management training. UMass Memorial's ability to embed claims data use into its culture and to share learning across clinical services offers lessons for health care organizations of any size.
Patient-centric care management

Schumarry H Chao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.s1-A.S10

Abstract:Objective: To review managed care's current cost management trends and the consumerism movement; to elucidate the pros and cons of key issues; and to describe the philosophy of focusing on the patient, also called patient-centric care, while improving the patient's care through value-based purchasing and plan design. Summary: Managed care is sometimes practiced using a silo approach with little concern for the consumer. In this model, medical and pharmaceutical issues are addressed in silos, and value is narrowly defined. Increasingly, cost and responsibility is shared with or shifted to the patients. Patients may be unable or unwilling to assume these costs or responsibilities. Several studies have demonstrated that they may react with noncompliance. Managed care's definition of value must expand and integrate across silos to consider the needs and interests of the patient's overall care, in particular, addressing key cost drivers in terms of diseases that cause recurring costs. Using predictive modeling can result in cost savings. A case study (Pitney Bowes) is included in this article.
Case management: creativity in the ambulatory environment

J O Hillman

Abstract:Case managers, serving as advocates for patients, can provide excellent cost-benefit to medical groups and patients alike. The author describes some of the important aspects of case management initiatives and how medical groups, in particular, can approach their implementation.
Best practice in unbilled account management: one medical center's story

Debra Menaker,Joshua Miller

Abstract:After implementing its new electronic health record, a large metropolitan academic medical center (AMC) decided to optimize its supporting business systems, beginning with billing. By identifying problems and taking the following corrective actions immediately, the AMC significantly reduced the number and average age of its unbilled accounts: Realigning system automation to improve routing efficiency. Facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration to better identify and correct the root causes of issues. Ensuring transparent data reporting by setting up different ways of viewing the underlying information.
A Case Management Approach in Stroke Care: A Mixed-Methods Acceptance Analysis From the Perspective of the Medical Profession

Juliane Andrea Duevel,Alina Baumgartner,John Grosser,Simone Kreimeier,Svenja Elkenkamp,Wolfgang Greiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000701

Abstract:Purpose of study: In terms of continuous and coordinated health care, cross-sectoral care structures are crucial. However, the German health care system is characterized by fragmentation of medical services and responsibilities. This fragmentation leads to multiple interfaces frequently causing loss of information, effectiveness, and quality. The concept of case management has the potential to improve cooperation between sectors and health care providers. Hence, a case management intervention for patients with stroke was evaluated with an acceptance analysis on the physicians' willingness to cooperate with stroke managers and their assessment of the potential of case management for the health care of patients with stroke. Primary practice settings: Primary practice settings included physicians working in the hospital, rehabilitation, and outpatient sectors who had actual or potential contact with a stroke case manager within the project region of East Westphalia-Lippe. Methodology and sample: The analysis was conducted using a mixed-methods approach. Expert interviews were conducted in 2020. Afterward a questionnaire was developed, which was then distributed to physicians in 2021. Both the interviews and the questionnaire included questions on conceptual knowledge and concrete expectations prior of the project, on experiences during the project and on recommendations and physicians' assessment of future organization in health care to classify and describe the acceptance. Results: Nine interviews were conducted and 23 questionnaires were completed. Only slightly more than 50% of the physicians had prior knowledge of the case management approach. Overall, ambiguous results concerning the acceptance of case managers were revealed. Additional personal assistance for patients with stroke was seen as beneficial at the same time critical perspectives regarding further fragmentation of health care and overlapping of competences with existing professional groups or forms of health care were collected. General practitioners in particular were critical of the case management approach. Implications for case management practice: From the physicians' point of view, at least two changes are necessary for the project approach to be integrated into standard care. First, the target group should be adapted according to the case management approach. Second, the delegation of tasks and responsibilities to case managers should be revised. The sectoral difference in the acceptance of case managers by physicians indicates that active cooperation and communication in everyday work has direct impact on the acceptance of a new occupational profession. Physician acceptance has a significant impact on the implementation of new treatment modalities and thus influences the overall quality of health care.

Using case management to improve claims payment

Case management's value is finally recognized. What happens now?

Value-Based Integrated Case Management at Payor Level: Implementation and Impact

Exposing Impediments to Insurance Claims Processing.

The paradox of case management

Navigating payment pitfalls in managed care

An Effective Program to Reduce Malpractice Claims and Payments in a Large Orthopaedic Practice

The Case for Capitation

Evaluating a Care Management Program for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries: Evidence from Rhode Island

Case management and patient safety: opportunities for process and performance improvement

Chronic care management: An opportunity to drive quality outcomes in oncology care.

Ten Years’ Experience Using an Integrated Workers’ Compensation Management System to Control Workers’ Compensation Costs

High-risk population health management--achieving improved patient outcomes and near-term financial results

Participatory risk management: promoting physician compliance with practice guidelines

Applying AI to Care Management and Claims Processing

The Impact of Case Management on Reducing Readmission for Patients Diagnosed With Heart Failure and Diabetes

Harnessing the power of medical malpractice data to improve patient care

Patient-centric care management

Case management: creativity in the ambulatory environment

Best practice in unbilled account management: one medical center's story

A Case Management Approach in Stroke Care: A Mixed-Methods Acceptance Analysis From the Perspective of the Medical Profession