Abstract:Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the content and quality of videos about bruxism treatments on YouTube, a platform frequently used by patients today to obtain information. Methods: A YouTube search was performed using the keywords "bruxism treatment" and "teeth grinding treatment". "The sort by relevance" filter was used for both search terms and the first 150 videos were saved. A total of 139 videos that met the study criteria were included in the study. Videos were classified as poor, moderate or excellent based on a usefulness score that evaluated content quality. The modified DISCERN tool was also used to evaluate video quality. Additionally, videos were categorized according to the upload source, target audience and video type. The types of treatments mentioned in the videos and the demographic data of the videos were recorded. Results: According to the usefulness score, 59% of the videos were poor-quality, 36.7% were moderate-quality and 4.3% were excellent-quality. Moderate-quality videos had a higher interaction index than excellent-quality videos (p = 0.039). The video duration of excellent-quality videos was longer than that of moderate and poor-quality videos (p = 0.024, p = 0.002). Videos with poor-quality content were found to have significantly lower DISCERN scores than videos with moderate (p < 0.001) and excellent-quality content (p = 0.008). Additionally, there was a significantly positive and moderate (r = 0.446) relationship between DISCERN scores and content usefulness scores (p < 0.001). There was only a weak positive correlation between DISCERN scores and video length (r = 0.359; p < 0.001). The videos uploaded by physiotherapists had significantly higher views per day and viewing rate than videos uploaded by medical doctors (p = 0.037), university-hospital-institute (p = 0.024) and dentists (p = 0.006). The videos uploaded by physiotherapists had notably higher number of likes and number of comments than videos uploaded by medical doctors (p = 0.023; p = 0.009, respectively), university-hospital-institute (p = 0.003; p = 0.008, respectively) and dentists (p = 0.002; p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: Although the majority of videos on YouTube about bruxism treatments are produced by professionals, most of the videos contain limited information, which may lead patients to debate treatment methods. Health professionals should warn patients against this potentially misleading content and direct them to reliable sources.

Is YouTube a reliable source of information for temporomandibular joint ankylosis?

Reliability and Usefulness of YouTube as a Source of Informative Media for Arthroscopic Tennis Elbow Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Published Videos

YouTube online videos as a source for patient education of cervical spondylosis—a reliability and quality analysis

A Quality Assessment of YouTube Content on Shoulder Instability

Low educational quality and trustworthiness of YouTube videos by physiotherapists on shoulder joint mobilization techniques: a descriptive study

Editorial Commentary: Surgical Videos on YouTube Are Not Peer Reviewed and Have Low Educational Value

Assessment of quality and reliability of YouTube videos for patient and physician education on inflammatory myositis

YouTube videos provide low-quality educational content about rotator cuff disease

Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions

Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain

Are social media platforms appropriate sources of information for patients regarding the topic of facial trauma?

Critical evaluation of YouTube videos regarding the all-on-4 dental implant treatment concept: A content-quality analysis

YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis

YouTube as a source of information on reactive arthritis: a quality analysis

Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review

Evaluation of the reliability and accuracy of YouTubeTM and TikTokTM contents about storage media for avulsed teeth: A cross‐sectional study

Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information on facial paralysis exercises

Bruxism treatment on Youtube: evaluating reliability and information accuracy

Orthodontic YouTube™ videos made by patients for patients: What are they about and are they accurate?

Information on surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on YouTube is highly biased and misleading

A quality analysis of robotic-assisted knee replacement surgery videos on Youtube