Abstract:Background: The need for classification systems for cardiovascular disease (CVD) that is population-specific is important towards understanding the clinical disease and diagnostics associated with the disease. This paper presents the form and validation results of this classification system. Method: The survey data used was captured from 778 participants, 526 persons with no prior CVD, and 252 who reported prior CVD. Binomial logistic regression and Discriminant analysis were utilised to develop classification models. This classification system provided a general measure of severity of disease by utilising scores estimated from two algorithms developed from 13 routine physiologic measurements, along with demographic information of age and ethnicity, inter alia, and previous health status. Results: For each model, specific score ranges were identified, which gave the best classification for those with a prior CVD incident (higher scores) and for others labelled as non-CVD (lower scores). The two classification models (Logistic Regression Model and Discriminant Analysis Model) developed had high area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) values (98% & 99%) and sensitivity (86 and 90%), which improved discrimination between Non-CVD and CVD participants and, more importantly, correctly classified a greater proportion of CVD participants. New to this type of research was the estimation and detailed evaluation of a range of scores, labelled non-differentiating, which fell in the middle of the spectrum and which contained the higher-end scores for the non-CVD individuals and the lower-end scores for CVD patients, all of whom were incorrectly classified, based on their prior history. Conclusion: The classification system of scores is able to differentiate the CVD status of individuals, with good predictability, and could assist physicians with recommending different treatment plans. The two models in this classification system each individually outperformed the three established models in terms of the strength of their correct classifications of individuals with or without prior reported CVD incidents. More importantly, they have smaller non-differentiating ranges than the three known models and, in that range, the two new models have lower CVD/non-CVD ratios suggesting they are more likely to misclassify non-CVD individuals compared to CVD patients, which is a more benign misclassification. Further, when used in combination, the two models increased the sensitivity, in classifying individuals of different ethnicities, beyond that of either one used independently or of any of the three standard European/North American models. These efforts will be instrumental in advancing personalised CVD management strategies and improving health outcomes across diverse populations.

The CHD severity classification system: development of a tool to assist with disease stratification for CHD research

Enhancing the Classification of Congenital Heart Defects for Outcome Association Studies in Birth Defects Registries

A classification system for identifying persons with an unknown cardiovascular disease (CVD) status for a multiracial/ ethnic Caribbean population

Anatomic and Physiologic Classification of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease to Predict Adverse Outcomes: Use of Administrative Codes Compared to Clinical Staging

A Population-Based, Prospective Cohort Study (EPICARD)

Differences in Quality of Life in Children Across the Spectrum of Congenital Heart Disease

Complication Severity Score for Growth-friendly Surgery Has Strong Interrater and Intrarater Agreement

Integrated multiomic characterization of congenital heart disease

New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification in adults with congenital heart disease: relation to objective measures of exercise and outcome

Examination of validity of identifying congenital heart disease from hospital discharge data without a gold standard: Using a data linkage approach

A Patient Similarity Network (CHDmap) to Predict Outcomes After Congenital Heart Surgery: Development and Validation Study

Electrocardiogram-based deep learning to predict mortality in paediatric and adult congenital heart disease

Clinical profile of congenital heart diseases detected in a tertiary hospital in China: a retrospective analysis

The Congenital Heart Initiative: Initial Results from a Novel Patient-Centered Registry for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease

Utilizing Fetal Echocardiography to Risk Stratify and Predict Neonatal Outcomes in Fetuses Diagnosed with Congenital Heart Disease

Current approach to genetic testing and genetic evaluation referrals for adults with congenital heart disease

Assessment of the CLOT (Children's Likelihood of Thrombosis) Real-Time Risk Prediction Model of Hospital-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in Children with Congenital Heart Disease

CHDmap: One Step Further Toward Integrating Medicine-Based Evidence Into Practice

A gender specific risk assessment of coronary heart disease based on physical examination data

Identifying novel data-driven subgroups in congenital heart disease using multi-modal measures of brain structure

Knowledge and perception among adults of their congenital heart disease: A single center cross-sectional study