Developing an Evidence-Based Ethics Education Program for Surgical Residents in Guatemala

Maria Lorena Aguilera Arévalo,Sergio Nicolás Martínez Seikavizza,Ery Mario Rodriguez,Miguel Angel Siguantay,Jorge Fernando Solares Ovalle,Luis Fernando Talé Rosales,Francis Barchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241257079
2024-06-07
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Abstract:Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, Volume 11, Issue , January-December 2024. OBJECTIVEThis study assessed 2 modalities for teaching responsible conduct of research and human subjects protection (RCR/HSP) to surgical residents in Guatemala—an "off the shelf" online curriculum and a new in-person curriculum specific to the local context.METHODSIn 2018, 160 surgical residents in 3 large urban hospitals in Guatemala City completed 2 online programs in RCR/HSP. Residents in the intervention arm also completed 7 weeks of in-person training. Pre- and post-assessments tested awareness of key concepts with particular attention to international and Guatemalan research regulations. Group differences in matched (pre- and post-) mean scores were analyzed using t-tests.RESULTSOne hundred forty residents completed pre- and post-training assessments and were included in the analytic sample. Overall mean scores improved modestly from 52.7 to 58.7 points out of 100. Intervention-arm trainees reported greater confidence in recognizing ethical issues, understanding legal and ethical requirements for research, and identifying, reporting and avoiding scientific misconduct than control-arm trainees.CONCLUSIONGiven the limited availability of RCR/HSP faculty, financial resources, and time in the surgical training schedule, the investigators recommend that academic authorities in Guatemala consider online training programs in RCR/HSP in all surgical residency programs as an affordable and scalable strategy to build ethical research skills in its surgical workforce. Investment in human resources to support in-person ethics education as a way to build self-efficacy in ethical decision-making should be considered.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?