Abstract:The only known cognitive architecture capable of human-level (or rat-level) performance is the human (rat) brain. Why have cognitive architectures equivalent to those instantiated by mammalian brains not been implemented in computers already? Is it just because we have not yet found the right ‘boxes’ to model in our data flow diagrams? Or is there a mysterious reason requiring the underlying hardware to be biologically-based? We surmise that the answer might lie in between: certain essential biological aspects of nervous systems, not (yet) routinely implemented in computational models of cognition, might prove to be necessary functional components. One such aspect is the tree-like structure of neuronal dendrites and axons, the branching inputs and outputs of nerve cells. The basic roles of dendritic and axonal arbors are respectively to integrate synaptic signals from, and to propagate firing patterns to, thousands of other neurons. Synaptic integration and plasticity in dendrites is mediated by their morphology and biophysics. Axons provide the vast majority of cable length, constituting the main determinant of network connectivity. Together, neuronal computation and circuitry provide the substrates for the activity dynamics instantiating cognitive function.An additional consequence of the tree-shape of neurons is far less recognized. Axons and dendrites determine not only which neurons are connected to which, and thus the possible activation patterns (mental states), but also which new connections might form given the right experience. Specifically, new synapses can only form between axons and dendrites that are in close proximity. This fundamental constraint may constitute the neural correlate of the common observation that knowledge of appropriate background information is necessary for memory formation. Specifically, neurons that are near each other (in connectivity space) encode related information. This biologically inspired design feature also enables cognitive architectures (e.g. neural networks) to learn real associations better than spurious co-occurrences, resulting in greater performance and enhanced robustness to noise.

XOR at a Single Vertex -- Artificial Dendrites

Boolean Computation in Single‐Transistor Neuron

Single-Neuron Criticality Optimizes Analog Dendritic Computation

Architects or Botanists? The Relevance of (Neuronal) Trees to Model Cognition

On the Solvability of the {XOR} Problem by Spiking Neural Networks

Biocomputing Model Using Tripartite Synapses Provides Reliable Neuronal Logic Gating with Spike Pattern Diversity

Artificial Dendritic Computation: The case for dendrites in neuromorphic circuits

Dendritic Integration Regulation and Neuronal Arithmetic Implemented in a Proton-Coupled Neuron Transistor

Optimal axonal and dendritic branching strategies during the development of neural circuitry

Dendritic-Inspired Processing Enables Bio-Plausible STDP in Compound Binary Synapses

A dendritic disinhibitory circuit mechanism for pathway-specific gating

A survey on dendritic neuron model: Mechanisms, algorithms and practical applications

Bio-realistic and versatile artificial dendrites made of anti-ambipolar transistors

An experimental evidence-based computational paradigm for new logic-gates in neuronal activity

A versatile circuit for emulating active biological dendrites applied to sound localisation and neuron imitation

Active Dendrites Enable Robust Spiking Computations despite Timing Jitter

Spatially-correlated Neuron Transistors with Ion-Gel Gating for Brain-Inspired Applications

A Hardware-Based Orientation Detection System Using Dendritic Computation

Demonstration that sublinear dendrites enable linearly non-separable computations

A Mathematical Theory of Cortex-Receptor Artificial Extension.

Beyond spiking networks: The computational advantages of dendritic amplification and input segregation