Abstract:In recent years collaborative robots have become major market drivers in industry 5.0, which aims to incorporate them alongside humans in a wide array of settings ranging from welding to rehabilitation. Improving human-machine collaboration entails using computational algorithms that will save processing as well as communication cost. In this study we have constructed an agent that can choose when to cooperate using an optimal strategy. The agent was designed to operate in the context of divergent interest tacit coordination games in which communication between the players is not possible and the payoff is not symmetric. The agent's model was based on a behavioral model that can predict the probability of a player converging on prominent solutions with salient features (e.g., focal points) based on the player's Social Value Orientation (SVO) and the specific game features. The SVO theory pertains to the preferences of decision makers when allocating joint resources between themselves and another player in the context of behavioral game theory. The agent selected stochastically between one of two possible policies, a greedy or a cooperative policy, based on the probability of a player to converge on a focal point. The distribution of the number of points obtained by the autonomous agent incorporating the SVO in the model was better than the results obtained by the human players who played against each other (i.e., the distribution associated with the agent had a higher mean value). Moreover, the distribution of points gained by the agent was better than any of the separate strategies the agent could choose from, namely, always choosing a greedy or a focal point solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to construct an intelligent agent that maximizes its utility by incorporating the belief system of the player in the context of tacit bargaining. This reward-maximizing strategy selection process based on the SVO can also be potentially applied in other human-machine contexts, including multiagent systems.

When is Human–Robot Joint Agency Effective? The Case of Cooperative Reaction Games

Human-AI Collaboration in a Cooperative Game Setting

Reciprocity and Its Neurological Correlates in Human-Agent Cooperation

Game-Theoretic Modeling of Human Adaptation in Human-Robot Collaboration

The Robot in the Room: Influence of Robot Facial Expressions and Gaze on Human-Human-Robot Collaboration

Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task: Comparing human and machine co-agents

Learned human-agent decision-making, communication and joint action in a virtual reality environment

More than Task Performance: Developing New Criteria for Successful Human-AI Teaming Using the Cooperative Card Game Hanabi

Evaluation of Human-AI Teams for Learned and Rule-Based Agents in Hanabi

Mixed-Initiative Human-Robot Teaming under Suboptimality with Online Bayesian Adaptation

A Robot's Expressive Language Affects Human Strategy and Perceptions in a Competitive Game

Trust and Cognitive Load During Human-Robot Interaction

The Effect of Robot Skill Level and Communication in Rapid, Proximate Human-Robot Collaboration

Goal Inference Improves Objective and Perceived Performance in Human-Robot Collaboration

Using a Stochastic Agent Model to Optimize Performance in Divergent Interest Tacit Coordination Games

Can Robotic Cues Manipulate Human Decisions? Exploring Consensus Building via Bias-Controlled Non-linear Opinion Dynamics and Robotic Eye Gaze Mediated Interaction in Human-Robot Teaming

Reinforcement Learning on Human Decision Models for Uniquely Collaborative AI Teammates

A Human-Robot Co-Manipulation Approach Based on Human Sensorimotor Information

Asynchronous Training of Mixed-Role Human Actors in a Partially-Observable Environment

Investigation of Joint Action in Go/No-Go Tasks: Development of a Human-Like Eye Robot and Verification of Action Space

Collaborating with Humans without Human Data