Abstract:In recent years we have seen fast progress on a number of benchmark problems in AI, with modern methods achieving near or super human performance in Go, Poker and Dota. One common aspect of all of these challenges is that they are by design adversarial or, technically speaking, zero-sum. In contrast to these settings, success in the real world commonly requires humans to collaborate and communicate with others, in settings that are, at least partially, cooperative. In the last year, the card game Hanabi has been established as a new benchmark environment for AI to fill this gap. In particular, Hanabi is interesting to humans since it is entirely focused on theory of mind, i.e., the ability to effectively reason over the intentions, beliefs and point of view of other agents when observing their actions. Learning to be informative when observed by others is an interesting challenge for Reinforcement Learning (RL): Fundamentally, RL requires agents to explore in order to discover good policies. However, when done naively, this randomness will inherently make their actions less informative to others during training. We present a new deep multi-agent RL method, the Simplified Action Decoder (SAD), which resolves this contradiction exploiting the centralized training phase. During training SAD allows other agents to not only observe the (exploratory) action chosen, but agents instead also observe the greedy action of their team mates. By combining this simple intuition with best practices for multi-agent learning, SAD establishes a new SOTA for learning methods for 2-5 players on the self-play part of the Hanabi challenge. Our ablations show the contributions of SAD compared with the best practice components. All of our code and trained agents are available at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/facebookresearch/Hanabi_SAD" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

Evaluation of Human-AI Teams for Learned and Rule-Based Agents in Hanabi

Reinforcement Learning on Human Decision Models for Uniquely Collaborative AI Teammates

More than Task Performance: Developing New Criteria for Successful Human-AI Teaming Using the Cooperative Card Game Hanabi

Human-AI Collaboration in a Cooperative Game Setting

Human-AI Coordination via Human-Regularized Search and Learning

Evaluating Visual Conversational Agents via Cooperative Human-AI Games

Winning Is Not Everything: Enhancing Game Development With Intelligent Agents

Maia-2: A Unified Model for Human-AI Alignment in Chess

Enhancing Human Experience in Human-Agent Collaboration: A Human-Centered Modeling Approach Based on Positive Human Gain

How Being Outvoted by AI Teammates Impacts Human-AI Collaboration

Toward Human-AI Alignment in Large-Scale Multi-Player Games

Human-AI Learning Performance in Multi-Armed Bandits

Human-aligned Chess with a Bit of Search

Warmth and competence in human-agent cooperation

Designing Skill-Compatible AI: Methodologies and Frameworks in Chess

Any-Play: An Intrinsic Augmentation for Zero-Shot Coordination

Simplified Action Decoder for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Human-AI Teamwork Interface Design Using Patterns of Interactions

Closing the human-AI team-mate gap: how changes to displayed information impact player behavior towards computer teammates

Beating humans in a penny-matching game by leveraging cognitive hierarchy theory and Bayesian learning