Abstract:PurposeTo determine the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics when placing or exchanging tunneled dialysis catheters in the chest.Materials and MethodsFresenius Vascular Care collects data from outpatient interventional centers, as part of a Q.A. and M.O.C. project. Data collection began in 2010 at 26 centers, and continues to date at 35 centers. Physicians at each center administer antibiotics based on their interpretation of best practice, with substantial variability in the administration of prophylactic antibiotics. At the time of each intervention collected data included the presence of preexisting infection, the use of antibiotic, antibiotic type, and route of administration. A follow-up phone call was made to each patient's dialysis center, one week after intervention to determine if the patient developed an infection. Data recorded in the patient's chart, was also submitted to a HIPPA compliant central database. WIRB provided a letter of exemption for data review. A statistical analysis was performed of data from 1/1/2010 through 6/30/2013. Analysis includes only tunneled chest wall catheters in patients without pre-existing infection. Data from 2010 and 2011 for catheter exchange was presented at last year's SIR meeting.ResultsNew catheter placement:3065 total patients. Data incomplete 934 patients. No antibiotics 819 patients with 5 infections. Antibiotic given 1312 patients with 3 infections. Odds ratio 2.68 p-value 0.27Catheter Exchange: 8504 total patients. Data incomplete 2488 patients. No antibiotics 2235 patients with 24 infections. Oral antibiotic 1522 patients with 7 infections. Odds ratio 2.35 p-value 0.041.IV antibiotic 2259 patients with 5 infections. Odds ratio 4.89 p-value 0.0004.There was a substantial decrease in the rate of infection in the non-antibiotic group from 1 in 42 during 2010 to 1 in 154 for the remaining 2.5 years; thus, 2010 data drove significance.ConclusionThere was no definite benefit demonstrated for the use of prophylactic antibiotics with new catheter placement. Oral and IV antibiotics significantly reduced the rate of infection following catheter exchange, but the effect is substantially stronger with IV antibiotics. PurposeTo determine the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics when placing or exchanging tunneled dialysis catheters in the chest. To determine the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics when placing or exchanging tunneled dialysis catheters in the chest. Materials and MethodsFresenius Vascular Care collects data from outpatient interventional centers, as part of a Q.A. and M.O.C. project. Data collection began in 2010 at 26 centers, and continues to date at 35 centers. Physicians at each center administer antibiotics based on their interpretation of best practice, with substantial variability in the administration of prophylactic antibiotics. At the time of each intervention collected data included the presence of preexisting infection, the use of antibiotic, antibiotic type, and route of administration. A follow-up phone call was made to each patient's dialysis center, one week after intervention to determine if the patient developed an infection. Data recorded in the patient's chart, was also submitted to a HIPPA compliant central database. WIRB provided a letter of exemption for data review. A statistical analysis was performed of data from 1/1/2010 through 6/30/2013. Analysis includes only tunneled chest wall catheters in patients without pre-existing infection. Data from 2010 and 2011 for catheter exchange was presented at last year's SIR meeting. Fresenius Vascular Care collects data from outpatient interventional centers, as part of a Q.A. and M.O.C. project. Data collection began in 2010 at 26 centers, and continues to date at 35 centers. Physicians at each center administer antibiotics based on their interpretation of best practice, with substantial variability in the administration of prophylactic antibiotics. At the time of each intervention collected data included the presence of preexisting infection, the use of antibiotic, antibiotic type, and route of administration. A follow-up phone call was made to each patient's dialysis center, one week after intervention to determine if the patient developed an infection. Data recorded in the patient's chart, was also submitted to a HIPPA compliant central database. WIRB provided a letter of exemption for data review. A statistical analysis was performed of data from 1/1/2010 through 6/30/2013. Analysis includes only tunneled chest wall catheters in patients without pre-existing infection. Data from 2010 and 2011 for catheter exchange was presented at last year's SIR meeting. ResultsNew catheter placement:3065 total patients. Data incomplete 934 patients. No antibiotics 819 patients with 5 infections. Antibiotic given 1312 patients with 3 infections. Odds ratio 2.68 p-value 0.27Catheter Exchange: 8504 total patients. Data incomplete 2488 patients. No antibiotics 2235 patients with 24 infections. Oral antibiotic 1522 patients with 7 infections. Odds ratio 2.35 p-value 0.041.IV antibiotic 2259 patients with 5 infections. Odds ratio 4.89 p-value 0.0004.There was a substantial decrease in the rate of infection in the non-antibiotic group from 1 in 42 during 2010 to 1 in 154 for the remaining 2.5 years; thus, 2010 data drove significance. New catheter placement: 3065 total patients. Data incomplete 934 patients. No antibiotics 819 patients with 5 infections. Antibiotic given 1312 patients with 3 infections. Odds ratio 2.68 p-value 0.27 Catheter Exchange: 8504 total patients. Data incomplete 2488 patients. No antibiotics 2235 patients with 24 infections. Oral antibiotic 1522 patients with 7 infections. Odds ratio 2.35 p-value 0.041. IV antibiotic 2259 patients with 5 infections. Odds ratio 4.89 p-value 0.0004. There was a substantial decrease in the rate of infection in the non-antibiotic group from 1 in 42 during 2010 to 1 in 154 for the remaining 2.5 years; thus, 2010 data drove significance. ConclusionThere was no definite benefit demonstrated for the use of prophylactic antibiotics with new catheter placement. Oral and IV antibiotics significantly reduced the rate of infection following catheter exchange, but the effect is substantially stronger with IV antibiotics. There was no definite benefit demonstrated for the use of prophylactic antibiotics with new catheter placement. Oral and IV antibiotics significantly reduced the rate of infection following catheter exchange, but the effect is substantially stronger with IV antibiotics.

Risk Factors for Invasive Interventions in Hospitalized Children With Suppurative Cervical Lymphadenitis

Management of Persistent Low-Suspicion Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Pediatric Patients

Incidence of an Identifiable Organism in Children Who Underwent a Surgical Procedure for Granulomatous Cervical Lymphadenopathy

Clinical Features of Streptococcus Intermedius Infection in Children: a Case Series Study.

Factors predictive of complicated appendicitis in children

Improving treatment plan and mental health in children with abdominal infection for broad-spectrum bacterial infections

Indwelling-tunneled-central-venous-catheter-related early bacteremia and preoperative prophylaxis: a case and control study

Development of an algorithm for the management of cervical lymphadenopathy in children: consensus of the Italian Society of Preventive and Social Pediatrics, jointly with the Italian Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and the Italian Society of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Nonsurgical Management of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: the Analysis of Treatment Outcome in Relationship with Antimicrobial Regimens and Adverse Prognostic Factors

Pediatric Subcutaneous Abscess: Still a Clinical Exam-Based Diagnosis and Treatment

Changes of clinical characteristics of hospitalized children with fever and cervical lymphadenopathy in general hospital

Early clinical predictors for the prognosis of invasive pneumococcal disease

Examining Infectious Complications Following Lumbar Puncture in Children

Invasive Bacterial and Fungal Infections After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Single-center Experience

Etiological Spectrum of Lymphadenopathy Among Children on Lymph Node Biopsy

When is surgical intervention needed in oral and maxillofacial space infection patients? A retrospective case control study in 46 patients

Invasive Group A Streptococcus Infection in Children in Central Israel in 2012-2019

Prevalence of and Risks for Bacterial Infections in Hospitalized Children With Bronchiolitis

Prophylactic Antibiotics and Tunneled Dialysis Catheter Interventions in the Chest

Novel risk factors for central-line associated bloodstream infections in critically ill children

Complications in Pediatric Acute Mastoiditis: HCUP KID Analysis