Abstract:Abstract [The Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) detects total lightning continuously from space, and does not distinguish intra‐cloud (IC) from cloud‐to‐ground (CG) lightning. This research focuses on differentiating CG and IC lightning detected by GLM using a random forests (RF) model. GLM flash and group characteristics are implemented into the RF model and used to predict flash type. The most important flash characteristic for distinguishing flash type is the maximum group area. Other features with high feature importance include time‐of‐day, elongation, propagation, footprint, slope, maximum distance between groups and events, and mean energy. Skill scores showcase the model's ability to distinguish flash type with moderate skill, with 81% probability of detection, 71% percent correct, 36% false alarm rate, 36% false alarm ratio, and 56% critical success index. These scores improve further when study area is limited to CONUS and the Southeastern United States. These results can be used to aid in future climatological analysis of flash type.]Plain Language Summary The Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) is a satellite‐based lightning sensor that allows for continuous detection of light emitted from the cloud tops due to lightning. GLM does not distinguish if the lightning is connecting to ground (CG) or remaining in the cloud (IC). In order to distinguish CG and IC flashes, this research uses a machine learning method called random forests (RF). The RF model attempts to classify lightning flashes based on their size, duration, and intensity. The most important flash characteristics for distinguishing flash type are the features related to the areal size of the lightning and the time of day the lightning occurs. Overall, moderate success is shown when attempting to divide total lightning into CG and IC over the 2018 period. This information can be used by researchers to improve the use of GLM in the study of different storm types as well as aiding in wildfire forecasting.Key Points Although there is substantial overlap in the distributions for cloud‐to‐ground (CG) and intra‐cloud (IC) flash characteristics, the mean values differ Most important features for flash distinction are maximum group area, time‐of‐day, elongation, propagation, footprint, slope, and max group/event distance Results show skill in the random forests model's ability to distinguish CG and IC flashes in the Geostationary Lightning Mapper data

GOES GLM, biased bolides, and debiased distributions

Correction and calibration of atmospheric impact observations in GOES GLM data

Processes in negative and positive CG lightning flashes detected from space by GLM

The Impact of Single Group Flashes on Geostationary Lightning Mapper Data

Validating GOES Radar Estimation via Machine Learning to Inform NWP (GREMLIN) product over CONUS

Bayesian analysis of the detection performance of the Lightning Imaging Sensors

Making a Superbolt: Reconciling Observations of the Optically Brightest Lightning on Earth From Different Satellites

Quality Control of Geostationary Lightning Mapper Observations for Tropical Cyclone Applications

Classification of GLM Flashes Using Random Forests

Estimating and Analyzing Long-Term Multi-GNSS Inter-System Bias Based on Uncombined PPP

Development of Vertical Radar Reflectivity Profiles Based on Lightning Density Using the Geostationary Lightning Mapper Dataset in the Subtropical Region of Brazil

Oxygen line in fireball spectra and its application to satellite observations

Lightning Nowcasting with Aerosol-Informed Machine Learning and Satellite-Enriched Dataset

GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle Filtering

Microburst nowcasting applications of GOES

The Overlooked Potential of Generalized Linear Models in Astronomy - I: Binomial Regression

Predicting Geostationary (GOES) 4.1–30 keV Electron Flux Over All MLT Using LEEMYR Regression Models

Characterizing GPROF Regional Bias Using Radar-Derived Hydrometeor Information

GPS and GLONASS observable-specific code bias estimation: comparison of solutions from the IGS and MGEX networks

Characterization of the Impact of Glonass Observables on Receiver Bias Estimation for Ionospheric Studies

Latent Gaussian Models for High-Dimensional Spatial Extremes