Performance Assessment Indicators for Comparing Recreational Services of Urban Parks

Yang Yang,Zhifang Wang,Guangsi Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073337
IF: 4.614
2021-03-24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Parks can offer varied services to human well-being, including recreational services (RS); however, there is insufficient understanding of park differences concerning the actual performance of their varied RS. To fill this gap, this study aimed to develop a set of performance indicators as a tool for comparing the functional efficacy of RS among different parks. The indicators covered three aspects of RS: recreational usage of various physical activities, their recreational satisfaction level and the collective performance rating. These indicators were applied in a case study of four parks in Guangzhou, China, based upon on-site observation and a questionnaire survey. The functional difference of these indicators was compared and the collective indicator was found to be able to effectively capture different efficacies of urban parks in supporting varied RS. Results show all the parks were far from reaching the maximum performance of designed RS, so it is worthy of consideration by urban managers to further improve their RS efficacy. In addition, the overall spatial design and configuration were inferred to be essential for improving the RS efficacy of urban parks, but not park size nor ornamental vegetation. The findings offered valuable evidence for the optimal spatial design and management of urban parks.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of evaluating the effectiveness of urban parks in providing Recreational Services (RS). Specifically, the authors point out that although urban parks can offer a variety of recreational services, there is currently insufficient understanding of the actual performance differences of these services among different parks. Therefore, the paper aims to develop a set of performance evaluation metrics as a tool to compare the effectiveness of different urban parks in terms of recreational services. These metrics cover three aspects of recreational services: recreational use for various physical activities, user recreational satisfaction, and overall performance rating. By applying these metrics, the study hopes to reveal functional differences in the effectiveness of recreational services among different parks and provide scientific evidence for the optimized spatial design and management of urban parks.