Abstract:Humans interact with animals in numerous ways and on numerous levels. We are indeed living in an “animal”s world,’ in the sense that our lives are very much intertwined with the lives of animals. This also means that animals, like those dogs we commonly refer to as our pets, are living in a “human’s world” in the sense that it is us, not them, who, to a large degree, define and manage the interactions we have with them. In this sense, the human-animal relationship is nothing we should romanticize: it comes with clear power relations and thus with a set of responsibilities on the side of those who exercise this power. This holds, despite the fact that we like to think about our dogs as human’s best friend. Dogs have been part of human societies for longer than any other domestic species. Like no other species they exemplify the role of companion animals. Relationships with pet dogs are both very widespread and very intense, often leading to strong attachments between owners or caregivers and animals and to a treatment of these dogs as family members or even children. But how does this relationship look from the dogs’ perspective? How do they perceive the humans they engage with? What responsibilities and duties arise from the kind of mutual understanding, attachment, and the supposedly “special” bonds we form with them? Are there ethical implications, maybe even ethical implications beyond animal welfare? The past decades have seen an upsurge of research from comparative cognition on pet dogs’ cognitive and social skills, especially in comparison with and reference to humans. We will therefore set our discussion about the nature and ethical dimensions of the human–dog relationship against the background of the current empirical knowledge on dog (social) cognition. This allows us to analyze the human–dog relationship by applying an interdisciplinary approach that starts from the perspective of the dog to ultimately inform the perspective of humans. It is our aim to thereby identify ethical dimensions of the human–dog relationship that have been overlooked so far.

Differences and Similarities in Humans' Perceptions of the Thinking and Feeling of a Dog and a Boy

Think Versus Feel: Two Dimensions of Brand Anthropomorphism: an Abstract

Does Subjective Rating Reflect Behavioural Coding? Personality in 2 Month-Old Dog Puppies: An Open-Field Test and Adjective-Based Questionnaire

How Dogs Perceive Humans and How Humans Should Treat Their Pet Dogs: Linking Cognition With Ethics

Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions

The Nature and Psychological Impact of Child/Adolescent Attachment to Dogs Compared with Other Companion Animals

Children Value Animals More Than Adults Do: A Conceptual Replication and Extension

Mind perception and moral judgment in autism

Choosing between the Emotional Dog and the Rational Pal: A Moral Dilemma with a Tail

Does Pet Parenting Style predict the social and problem-solving behavior of pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)?

A comparison of dog–dog and dog–human play behaviour

Mind Perception of a Sociable Humanoid Robot: A Comparison Between Elderly and Young Adults

A preliminary analysis of the effect of individual differences on cognitive performance in young companion dogs

Personality and Cognitive Profiles of Animal-Assisted Intervention Dogs and Pet Dogs in an Unsolvable Task

A Robot Is Not Worth Another: Exploring Children’s Mental State Attribution to Different Humanoid Robots

Folk-Psychological Interpretation of Human vs. Humanoid Robot Behavior: Exploring the Intentional Stance toward Robots

Comparative Analysis of Sentiments in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Imagining Others’ Minds: The Positive Relation Between Children’s Role Play and Anthropomorphism

Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations

Kids See Human Too: Adapting an Individual Differences Measure of Anthropomorphism for a Child Sample