Abstract:Since most animal species have been recognized as sentient beings, emotional state may be a good indicator of welfare in animals. The goal of this study was to manipulate the environment of nine beagle research dogs to highlight physiological responses indicative of different emotional experiences. Stimuli were selected to be a more or a less positive food (meatball or food pellet) or social reward (familiar person or less familiar person). That all the stimuli were positive and of different reward value was confirmed in a runway motivation test. Dogs were tested individually while standing facing a display theatre where the different stimuli could be shown by lifting a shutter. The dogs approached and remained voluntarily in the test system. They were tested in four sessions (of 20s each) for each of the four stimuli. A test session consisted of four presentation phases (1st exposure to stimulus, post exposure, 2nd exposure, and access to reward). Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) responses were recorded during testing in the experimental room and also when lying resting in a quiet familiar room. A new method of 'stitching' short periods of HRV data together was used in the analysis. When testing different stimuli, no significant differences were observed in HR and LF:HF ratio (relative power in low frequency (LF) and the high-frequency (HF) range), implying that the sympathetic tone was activated similarly for all the stimuli and may suggest that dogs were in a state of positive arousal. A decrease of HF was associated with the meatball stimulus compared to the food pellet and the reward phase (interacting with the person or eating the food) was associated with a decrease in HF and RMSSD (root mean square of successive differences of inter-beat intervals) compared to the preceding phase (looking at the person or food). This suggests that parasympathetic deactivation is associated with a more positive emotional state in the dog. A similar reduction in HF and RMSSD was found in the test situation compared to the resting situation. This is congruent with the expected autonomic effects related to postural shift i.e. sympathetic activation and parasympathetic withdrawal, during standing versus lying, but it cannot explain the parasympathetic deactivation in response to the more positive stimuli since the dogs were always standing in the test situation. We discuss the systematic pattern of responses, which support that increased HR and LF:HF ratio are associated with emotional arousal, but add the new proposal that a combined decrease in RMSSD and HF may reflect a more positively valenced emotional state even when an individual is already in a positive psychological state.

Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations

Dog–human vocal interactions match dogs' sensory-motor tuning

Lateralized behavior and cardiac activity of dogs in response to human emotional vocalizations

Dogs and humans respond to emotionally competent stimuli by producing different facial actions

Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions

Human Non-linguistic Vocal Repertoire: Call Types and Their Meaning

Alarm or emotion? intranasal oxytocin helps determine information conveyed by dog barks for adult male human listeners

Dogs distinguish authentic human emotions without being empathic

Orienting asymmetries and physiological reactivity in dogs’ response to human emotional faces

Recognition of vocal socioemotional expressions at varying levels of emotional intensity.

Within the sound of trouble: Do humans use pitch to correctly assess emotional arousal across species?

Empathy enhances decoding accuracy of human neurophysiological responses to emotional facial expressions of humans and dogs

Emotional contexts influence vocal individuality in ungulates

Assessing positive emotional states in dogs using heart rate and heart rate variability

Humans need auditory experience to produce typical volitional nonverbal vocalizations

Utilizing vocalizations to gain insight into the affective states of non-human mammals

Goats distinguish between positive and negative emotion-linked vocalisations

Do human screams permit individual recognition?

Representation of rewards differing in their hedonic valence in the caudate nucleus correlates with the performance in a problem-solving task in dogs (Canis familiaris)

Horses discriminate between human facial and vocal expressions of sadness and joy

Does My Dog ''Speak'' Like Me? The Acoustic Correlation between Pet Dogs and Their Human Owners