Is intracranial electroencephalography mandatory for MRI-negative neocortical epilepsy surgery?

Zhihao Guo,Chao Zhang,Xiu Wang,Chang Liu,Baotian Zhao,Jiajie Mo,Zhong Zheng,Xiaoqiu Shao,Jianguo Zhang,Kai Zhang,Wenhan Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.8.jns22995

IF: 5.408

2022-10-01

Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract:OBJECTIVE MRI-negative focal epilepsy is one of the most challenging cases in surgical epilepsy treatment. Many epilepsy centers recommend intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) for MRI-negative cases, especially neocortical epilepsy. This retrospective study aimed to explore whether intracranial monitoring is mandatory in MRI-negative neocortical epilepsy surgery and the factors that significantly influence the decision on whether to perform intracranial recording. METHODS In this study, consecutive surgical patients with focal MRI-negative neocortical epilepsy were recruited. All patients underwent routine preoperative evaluation according to the dedicated protocol of the authors’ epilepsy center to determine the treatment strategy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical strategy, i.e., a direct group and a stereo-EEG (SEEG)–guided group. History of epilepsy, seizure frequency, interictal and ictal EEG data, PET data, PET/MRI coregistration data, neuropathological findings, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors influencing the decision to perform SEEG monitoring. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were included in this study, 19 and 45 of whom underwent direct and SEEG-guided cortical resection, respectively. At an average follow-up of 3.9 years postoperatively, 56 patients (87.5%) had Engel class I results without permanent neurological deficits. Surgical outcomes were not significantly different between the direct and SEEG-guided groups (94.7% vs 84.4%). PET hypometabolic abnormalities were detected in all patients. There were significant differences between the two groups in the extent of hypometabolism (focal vs nonfocal, p < 0.01) and pathological subtype (focal cortical dysplasia type II vs others, p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that the extent of hypometabolism (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00–0.15; p = 0.001) was the only independent factor affecting the treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS Careful selection of patients with MRI-negative neocortical epilepsy may yield favorable outcomes after direct cortical resection without intracranial monitoring. PET/MRI coregistration plays an essential role in the preoperative evaluation and subsequent resection of these patients. Intracranial monitoring is not a mandatory requirement for surgery if the focal hypometabolic areas are consistent with the findings of semiology and scalp EEG.

surgery,clinical neurology