Abstract:Intracranial EEG (iEEG) is the gold standard technique for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localisation, but requires a hypothesis of which tissue is epileptogenic, guided by qualitative analysis of seizure semiology and other imaging modalities such as magnetoencephalography (MEG). We hypothesised that if quantifiable MEG band power abnormalities were sampled by iEEG, then patients' post-resection seizure outcome were better. Thirty-two individuals with neocortical epilepsy underwent MEG and iEEG recordings as part of pre-surgical evaluation. Interictal MEG band power abnormalities were derived using 70 healthy controls as a normative baseline. MEG abnormality maps were compared to electrode implantation, with the spatial overlap of iEEG electrodes and MEG abnormalities recorded. Finally, we assessed if the implantation of electrodes in abnormal tissue, and resection of the strongest abnormalities determined by MEG and iEEG explained surgical outcome. Intracranial electrodes were implanted in brain tissue with the most abnormal MEG findings in individuals that were seizure-free post-resection (T=3.9, p=0.003). The overlap between MEG abnormalities and iEEG electrodes distinguished outcome groups moderately well (AUC=0.68). In isolation, the resection of the strongest MEG and iEEG abnormalities separated surgical outcome groups well (AUC=0.71, AUC=0.74 respectively). A model incorporating all three features separated outcome groups best (AUC=0.80). Intracranial EEG is a key tool to delineate the EZ and help render patients seizure-free after resection. We showed that data-driven abnormalities derived from interictal MEG recordings have clinical value and may help guide electrode placement in individuals with neocortical epilepsy. Finally, our predictive model of post-operative seizure-freedom, which leverages both MEG and iEEG recordings, may aid patient counselling of expected outcome.

Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome