Clinical outcomes in newborns receiving glutose 15 versus sweet cheeks oral glucose gel for neonatal hypoglycemia

Karen Stanzo,Traci Szostek,Sujata Desai,Arpitha Chiruvolu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-01896-5
2024-02-11
Journal of Perinatology
Abstract:A meta-analysis including two randomized controlled trials stated that using glucose gel as a treatment for neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) probably increases the correction of hypoglycemic events, decreases family separation, and increases exclusive breastfeeding rates [1]. Our group previously reported the glucose inconsistency within the tube of Glutose 15 (Paddock Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN), an oral glucose gel that is designed to treat hypoglycemia in adult diabetics but is also being used widely in the US to treat NH [2]. Thereafter, our hospital switched to the use of a new gel manufactured specifically for neonates, and packaged in pre-filled syringes, Sweet Cheeks (Dandle Lion Medical, Danbury, CT). Subsequently, our team reported inconsistency of glucose concentration within the syringe of Sweet Cheeks [3]. However, since the Sweet Cheeks syringe contains only about 1 to 2 doses, in contrast to approximately 11 doses in the tube of Glutose 15, the clinical significance of these findings is unknown. There are no studies comparing these two brands of glucose gel now commonly used in the US. The purpose of this study is to close this gap by comparing functional outcomes in newborns who were treated for NH using Glutose 15 to those given Sweet Cheeks. This is an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing otherwise healthy newborns over 35 weeks of gestation in the mother-baby unit who were treated for NH with Glutose 15 (July 1, 2020–February 11, 2021) with infants treated for NH with Sweet Cheeks (February 12, 2021–January 8, 2022). All infants who were immediately admitted to the NICU after birth were excluded. Except for the brand of glucose gel they received, all newborns who experienced NH received the same care including skin-to-skin contact with the mother, frequent blood glucose monitoring, and early feeding (Supplementary Fig. 1). When glucose gel was indicated, nurses used gauze to dry the newborn's mouth and then massaged 0.5 mL/kg of the gel into the buccal mucosa. Maternal and infant characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Analyses were performed utilizing IBM SPSS Version 29.
pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?