Kathryn Beardsall,Lynn Thomson,Catherine Guy,Isabel Iglesias-Platas,Mirjam M van Weissenbruch,Simon Bond,Annabel Allison,Sungwook Kim,Stavros Petrou,Beatrice Pantaleo,Roman Hovorka,David Dunger,REACT collaborative,Zoltan Molnar,Sheula Barlow,Sharon Baugh,Kathryn Johnson,Lindsay Uryn,Collette Spencer,Maria Hubbard,Sateeshkumar Somisetty,Olaitan Adesiyan,Jogesh Kapadia,Yvonne Millar,Kalyana Gurusamy,Lindsay Bibb,Kathryn Jones,Richard Heaver,Priya Muthukumar,Amy Nichols,Mark Johnson,Jenny Pond,Philippa Crowley,Christie Mellish,Divyen D Shah,Mercy Abraham,Presillina Vincent,Suma Anil Kumar,Angelina Iringan,Barbara Aninakwa,R A Dalangin-Chalmers,Annemieke de Lange

Abstract:Background: Hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia are common in preterm infants and have been associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity. Interventions to reduce risk associated with these exposures are particularly challenging due to the infrequent measurement of blood glucose concentrations, with the potential of causing more harm instead of improving outcomes for these infants. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is widely used in adults and children with diabetes to improve glucose control, but has not been approved for use in neonates. The REACT trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CGM in preterm infants requiring intensive care. Methods: This international, open-label, randomised controlled trial was done in 13 neonatal intensive care units in the UK, Spain, and the Netherlands. Infants were included if they were within 24 h of birth, had a birthweight of 1200 g or less, had a gestational age up to 33 weeks plus 6 days, and had parental written informed consent. Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to real-time CGM or standard care (with masked CGM for comparison) using a central web randomisation system, stratified by recruiting centre and gestational age (<26 or ≥26 weeks). The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of time sensor glucose concentration was 2·6-10 mmol/L for the first week of life. Safety outcomes related to hypoglycaemia (glucose concentrations <2·6 mmol/L) in the first 7 days of life. All outcomes were assessed on the basis of intention to treat in the full analysis set with available data. The study is registered with the International Standard Randomised Control Trials Registry, ISRCTN12793535. Findings: Between July 4, 2016, and Jan 27, 2019, 182 infants were enrolled, 180 of whom were randomly assigned (85 to real-time CGM, 95 to standard care). 70 infants in the real-time CGM intervention group and 85 in the standard care group had CGM data and were included in the primary analysis. Compared with infants in the standard care group, infants managed using CGM had more time in the 2·6-10 mmol/L glucose concentration target range (mean proportion of time 84% [SD 22] vs 94% [11]; adjusted mean difference 8·9% [95% CI 3·4-14·4]), equivalent to 13 h (95% CI 5-21). More infants in the standard care group were exposed to at least one episode of sensor glucose concentration of less than 2·6 mmol/L for more than 1 h than those in the intervention group (13 [15%] of 85 vs four [6%] of 70). There were no serious adverse events related to the use of the device or episodes of infection. Interpretation: Real-time CGM can reduce exposure to prolonged or severe hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Further studies using CGM are required to determine optimal glucose targets, strategies to obtain them, and the potential effect on long-term health outcomes. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanisms Evaluation Programme.

Agreement between intermittent glucose concentrations and continuous glucose monitoring in at-risk newborns

Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Conventional Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review Study Protocol.

The exploration of Guardian real-time continuous monitoring system in high-risk infants with hypoglycemia

A Pilot Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Patients with a Low 1-Hour Glucose Challenge Test Result versus Controls to Detect Maternal Hypoglycemia

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in preterm infants (REACT): an international, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Incidence of hypoglycemia in newborn infants identified as at risk

Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system in neonatal foals

Value of continuous glucose monitoring for minimizing severe hypoglycemia during tight glycemic control

Assessment of the Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Monitoring Dysglycaemia in Neonatal Patients.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Differences in Pregnancies With and Without Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

Untangling the physiology and pathophysiology of neonatal hypoglycaemia

Measuring glucose exposure and variability using continuous glucose monitoring in normal and abnormal glucose metabolism in pregnancy

Early blood glucose screening in asymptomatic high-risk neonates

Neonatal hypoglycemia and neurodevelopmental outcomes: Yesterday, today, tomorrow

Clinical Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancies Affected by Type 1 Diabetes

Variability in Diagnosis and Management of Hypoglycemia in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Impact of macronutrients intake on glycemic homeostasis of preterm infants: evidence from continuous glucose monitoring

Glucose variability in 6–12-month-old healthy infants

Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with inherited metabolic disorders at risk for Hypoglycemia and Nutritional implications

Accuracy of Point-of-Care Blood Glucometers in Neonates and Critically Ill Adults

1174-P: Characterization of Glucose Levels in Pregnancy Measured by Blood Glucose Testing or CGM Monitoring after a 50-g Screening or a 75-g or 100-g OGTT