Abstract:Background Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) can characterize tumor heterogeneity and provide information for biological guidance in radiotherapy (RT). Time‐dependent diffusion MRI (TDD‐MRI) derived parameters are promising QIBs, as they describe tissue microstructure with more specificity than traditional diffusion‐weighted MRI (DW‐MRI). Specifically, TDD‐MRI can provide information about both restricted diffusion and diffusional exchange, which are the two time‐dependent effects affecting diffusion in tissue, and relevant in tumors. However, exhaustive modeling of both effects can require long acquisitions and complex model fitting. Furthermore, several introduced TDD‐MRI measurements can require high gradient strengths and/or complex gradient waveforms that are possibly not available in RT settings. Purpose In this study, we investigated the feasibility of a simple analysis framework for the detection of restricted diffusion and diffusional exchange effects in the TDD‐MRI signal. To promote the clinical applicability, we use standard gradient waveforms on a conventional 1.5 T MRI system with moderate gradient strength (Gmax = 45 mT/m), and on a hybrid 1.5 T MRI‐Linac system with low gradient strength (Gmax = 15 mT/m). Methods Restricted diffusion and diffusional exchange were simulated in geometries mimicking tumor microstructure to investigate the DW‐MRI signal behavior and to determine optimal experimental parameters. TDD‐MRI was implemented using pulsed field gradient spin echo with the optimized parameters on a conventional MRI system and a MRI‐Linac. Experiments in green asparagus and 10 patients with brain lesions were performed to evaluate the time‐dependent diffusion (TDD) contrast in the source DW‐images. Results Simulations demonstrated how the TDD contrast was able to differentiate only dominating diffusional exchange in smaller cells from dominating restricted diffusion in larger cells. The maximal TDD contrast in simulations with typical cancer cell sizes and in asparagus measurements exceeded 5% on the conventional MRI but remained below 5% on the MRI‐Linac. In particular, the simulated TDD contrast in typical cancer cell sizes (r = 5–10 μm) remained below or around 2% with the MRI‐Linac gradient strength. In patients measured with the conventional MRI, we found sub‐regions reflecting either dominating restricted diffusion or dominating diffusional exchange in and around brain lesions compared to the noisy appearing white matter. Conclusions On the conventional MRI system, the TDD contrast maps showed consistent tumor sub‐regions indicating different dominating TDD effects, potentially providing information on the spatial tumor heterogeneity. On the MRI‐Linac, the available TDD contrast measured in asparagus showed the same trends as with the conventional MRI but remained close to typical measurement noise levels when simulated in common cancer cell sizes. On conventional MRI systems with moderate gradient strengths, the TDD contrast could potentially be used as a tool to identify which time‐dependent effects to include when choosing a biophysical model for more specific tumor characterization.

Time‐dependent MR diffusion analysis of functioning and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas/pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Histological and Molecular Classifications of Pediatric Glioma with Time-Dependent Diffusion MRI-based Microstructural Mapping.

Time-Dependent Diffusion MRI for Quantitative Microstructural Mapping of Prostate Cancer

Differentiating between non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas and sellar meningiomas using ADC

Assessing tumor microstructure with time‐dependent diffusion imaging: Considerations and feasibility on clinical MRI and MRI‐Linac

Improving Microstructural Estimation in Time‐Dependent Diffusion MRI With a Bayesian Method

Predicting the Consistency of Pituitary Macroadenomas: The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements for Surgical Planning

Diagnostic value of Vascular functionnal parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for pituitary microadenomas

Combination study of functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging on post visual pathways in patients with pituitary macroadenoma

Value of conventional MRI in combination with diffusion weighted imaging in the differentiatial diagnosis of invasive from non-invasive pituitary adenoma

A Pilot Study of Multidimensional Diffusion MRI for Assessment of Tissue Heterogeneity in Prostate Cancer

Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of pituitary region tumors

Diffusion–relaxation correlation spectrum imaging for predicting tumor consistency and gross total resection in patients with pituitary adenomas: a preliminary study

Time-Dependent Diffusion MRI Helps Predict Molecular Subtypes and Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Differentiation between phyllodes tumours and fibroadenomas using intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging

ADC histogram analysis for adrenal tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating adrenal adenoma from pheochromocytoma

Comparison of ADC values of intracranial hemangiopericytomas and angiomatous and anaplastic meningiomas.

Diagnostic Assessment by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance in Differentiation of Breast Lesions under Different Imaging Protocols

303 Long-Term Volumetric Analysis of Non-functioning Pituitary Microadenomas: An International, Multi-center Cohort Study

Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping using diffusion-weighted MRI: impact of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue and menopausal status on breast cancer diagnosis