Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) is endorsed by guidelines for the evaluation of obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) (1). However, real-world impact of selective use of FFRCT in patients with suspected OCAD by CCTA on subsequent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularization remains unclear. Purpose To assess the impact and diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT interpretation in patients with suspected OCAD by CCTA on downstream ICA and revascularization. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent coronary CCTA for the evaluation of stable chest pain between 01/10/2013 and 28/05/2021 in our tertiary university hospital were included in a registry. From a total population of 7541 patients, 1601 with reported anatomical obstructive OCAD on CCTA, were included in our study. OCAD was defined as the presence of a stenosis ≥ 50% in at least one of the three main vessels. CCTA were selectively send to FFRCT analysis according to radiologist's decision. A numerical interpretation of FFRCT was firstly performed by defining a lowest distal value≤ 0.8 as a possible need for revascularization and secondly, a comprehensive interpretation of FFRCT was completed by an experienced interventional cardiologist and radiologist. In brief, this interpretation takes into account not only the lowest distal FFRCT value, but also the post-stenotic FFR, the trans-lesional gradient and anatomical distribution of FFRCT changes. Results From a registry of 7541 patients, suspected OCAD derived from CCTA was reported in 1601 cases, including 808 (50.5%) patients evaluated by FFRCT. ICA was performed in 1160 (72.5%) and revascularization in 559 (34.9%) patients. Overall proportion of ICA decreased from 77.2 to 67.8% with FFRCT use (chi2 p<0.01) (Figure 1). After propensity score weighting, FFRCT use was independently associated with decreased ICA (OR: 0.66; 95% CI 0.53–0.83, p< 0.001) and with a decreased rate of myocardial revascularization (OR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.58 –0.88, p< 0.01). Compared to a numerical interpretation, a comprehensive assessment of FFRCT increased the ratio of revascularization per ICA (61.8 vs 50.2 %, p< 0.01) and was more accurate to rule-in OCAD patient requiring a myocardial revascularization (Figure 2). After propensity score adjustment, numerically abnormal FFRCT and pathological coronary disease distribution on comprehensive assessment similar were still independently associated with an increased the rate of ICA use (OR:3.03 95% CI 2.18–4.23, p< 0.001 and OR: 3.45; 95% CI 2.47–4.82, p< 0.001, respectively) and myocardial revascularization (OR:5.13; 95% CI 3.23–8.15, p< 0.001 and OR:6.48; 95% CI 4.55–9.22, p< 0.001, respectively). Conclusion We observed in a large single-center real-world registry that implementing FFRCT downstream ICA and that a comprehensive assessment of FFRCT ensures an improved selection of patients requiring myocardial revascularization.

Impact of coronary CT angiography on the hospital outcome among patients admitted with AMI undergoing revascularization procedures in theUS

Impact of coronary computed tomographic angiography results on patient and physician behavior in a low-risk population

Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography for coronary in-stent re-stenosis

Comparison of Prognosis Between Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

CT coronary angiography and COVID-19: inpatient use in acute chest pain service

Coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with low-to-intermediate risk chest pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

National Trends in Coronary Artery Disease Imaging: Associations With Health Care Outcomes and Costs

Impact of atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography on diagnostic certainty, downstream testing, coronary revascularization, and medical therapy: the CERTAIN study

The effect of CTCA guided selective invasive graft assessment on coronary angiographic parameters and outcomes: Insights from the BYPASS-CTCA trial

Incremental value of computed tomography angiographic derived fractional flow reserve in patients with stable chest pain and anatomical obstructive coronary artery disease

In-Hospital Outcomes of Combined Coronary Revascularization and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inpatient Nationwide Analysis

Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography? Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial

Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Based on Published Data from 7458 Patients

Coronary atherosclerosis imaging by CT to improve clinical outcomes

Impact of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (R‐PCI) With and Without CCTA‐Guidance on Clinical Outcomes and Hospital Economics: A Single Center Registry

Value of coronary computed tomography angiography in ruling out coronary artery disease before intermediate- and high-risk non-cardiac surgery.

Association of cardiac events with coronary artery disease detected by 64-slice or greater coronary CT angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stress computed tomography perfusion versus stress cardiac magnetic resonance for the management of suspected or known coronary artery disease: resources and outcomes impact (STRATEGY II Study)

The early after discharge cardiac CT for low-risk chest pain study: the ED-CT study

Favorable impact of FFRCT on myocardial revascularization outcomes: results from an observational real-world registry