Abstract:Background Artificial intelligence (AI)-based quantitative computed tomography (AI-QCT) is a novel tool for automated plaque characterization and quantification from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The prognostic value of various AI-QCT plaque types on top of the presence of obstructive or ischemic coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown. Purpose To investigate the added prognostic value for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of AI-QCT total plaque burden (percent atheroma volume (PAV) %), and its subcomponents non-calcified plaque burden (NCPB), low-attenuation plaque burden (LAP), and calcified plaque burden (CPB) (%) on top of obstructive or ischemic CAD. Methods A cohort of 2007 symptomatic patients having undergone CCTA and selective downstream PET perfusion for suspected CAD was analyzed. Patients with prior or early elective revascularization within 6 months from CCTA were excluded. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥1 vessel with >50% visual stenosis, and ischemic CAD as absolute hyperemic myocardial blood flow ≤2.3 ml/g/min in ≥2 adjacent segments on 15O-H2O PET. Multivariable Cox regressions adjusted for clinical confounders (age, sex hypertension, typical angina) including each plaque type separately (per 1.0%) on top of obstructive or ischemic CAD, respectively, were performed. The amount of LAP was <1% and therefore pooled together with NCPB. Results Throughout a median follow-up of 7 years, 72/2007 patients experienced ACS (50 myocardial infarction, 22 unstable angina). On top of obstructive CAD, all plaque types were independent predictors of ACS (Figure 1A), however according to the C-indexes (p-value vs. obstructive CAD), only PAV (C-index=0.814, p=0.010) and NCPB+LAP (C-index=0.818, p=0.014), but not CPB (C-index=0.800, p=0.066) significantly improved the prediction of ACS on top of obstructive CAD (C-index=0.790) (Figure 2A). On top of ischemic CAD (1967 patients, 66 events), all plaque types were also independent predictors of ACS (Figure 1B). But, similarly, according to the C-indexes (p-value vs. ischemic CAD), only PAV (C-index=0.818, p=0.003), and NCPB+LAP (C-index=0.818, p=0.005), but not CPB (C-index=0.798, p=0.054) significantly improved the prediction of ACS on top of ischemic CAD (C-index=0.776) (Figure 2B). NCPB+LAP alone performed similarly as PAV on top of obstructive (p=0.554) and ischemic CAD (p=0.991) (Figure 2). Conclusions Among patients with native coronary arteries treated medically, AI-based plaque quantification significantly improved the prediction of ACS on top of obstructive or ischemic CAD. The risk of ACS was largely related to NCPB+LAP, whereas CPB did not significantly improve risk stratification.Adjusted HR for ACS per plaque typeC-indexes for ACS

Impact of atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography on diagnostic certainty, downstream testing, coronary revascularization, and medical therapy: the CERTAIN study

Atherosclerosis Imaging Quantitative Computed Tomography (AI-QCT) to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography in the randomized controlled CONSERVE trial

Prognostic value of a novel artificial intelligence-based coronary computed tomography angiography-derived ischaemia algorithm for patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

Atherosclerosis quantification and cardiovascular risk: the ISCHEMIA trial

Utility of Artificial Intelligence Plaque Quantification: Results of the DECODE Study

Prognostic value of a novel artificial intelligence-based coronary CTA-derived ischemia algorithm among patients with normal or abnormal myocardial perfusion

Assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden: comparison of AI-QCT versus SIS, CAC, visual and CAD-RADS stenosis categories

Does coronary CT angiography improve risk stratification over coronary calcium scoring in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease? Results from the prospective multicenter international CONFIRM registry

Using Artificial Intelligence to Semi-Quantitate Coronary Calcium as an ‘Incidentaloma’ on Non-Gated, Non-Contrast CT Scans, A Single-Center Descriptive Study in West Michigan.

Development and Validation of a Quantitative Coronary CT Angiography Model for Diagnosis of Vessel-Specific Coronary Ischemia

Artificial intelligence-based automated plaque quantification from CCTA to predict acute coronary syndrome on top of obstructive or ischemic coronary artery disease

Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary artery disease assessment using computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation

Application of Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Atherosclerosis by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography

Potential of artificial intelligence to differentiate between non-obstructive and obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary CT angiography

Prospective deep learning-based quantitative assessment of coronary plaque by computed tomography angiography compared with intravascular ultrasound: the REVEALPLAQUE study

Combination of computed tomography angiography with coronary artery calcium score for improved diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of stable chest pain patients referred for invasive coronary angiography

Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Very-High-Risk Patients Using Ultra-High Resolution Spectral Photon-Counting CT

How early can atherosclerosis be detected by coronary CT angiography? Insights from quantitative CT analysis of serial scans in the PARADIGM trial

Relationship of age, atherosclerosis and angiographic stenosis using artificial intelligence

Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a Consensus Statement from the Quantitative Cardiovascular Imaging Study Group