Abstract:Patients with chronic pulmonary disease commonly present with dyspnea, cough, fatigue, physical limitations, and low Quality-of-Life (QoL). With these morbidities and physical limitations, it may be difficult to perform their day-to-day activities. The London Chest Activity Daily Living (LCADL) scale assesses the self-reported dyspnea of patients with chronic respiratory disease during Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The study was designed to assess the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on the dyspnea grade (mMRC scale), the Quality-of-Life parameters viz LCADL scale, 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and lung functions (FEV1 & FVC). The study is a retrospective observational study conducted over a period of 1 year, at the Department of Pulmonology, Bhakti Vedanta Hospital & Research Institute. Patients with different pulmonary conditions such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), Post-covid Lung Dysfunction, etc. were enrolled in the study. A total of 80 patients were referred to Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR). Out of which, 40 patients completed an 8-week program. The distribution of the study population was as follows: 18 patients with COPD, 13 patients with ILD, 9 patients with other pulmonary diseases. 15 patients required oxygen support where oxygen saturation (SpO2) was < 90% at baseline at room air. The outcome measures were assessed in these patients at the time of enrollment (Week 0) and at the end of the program (Week 8). Overall, the statistically significant difference noted in Quality-of-Life parameters like LCADL score, mMRC, 6MWT, and lung functions (FEV1, FVC) with an 8-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation program. The p-value (< 0.001) was found in London Chest Activity Daily Living (LCADL) score. Domestic, physical activity had better scores with respect to all parameters after completion of the 8-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) program. The dyspnea grade on the mMRC scale improved from 1.9 ± 0.591 to 0.45 ± 0.50. The p-value was statistically significant (p < 0.001). 6 MWT distance was improved from 169.5 meters to 324.5 meters at the completion of 8-weeks, the mean difference was 155 meters which was found to be statistically significant. The p-value (< 0.001) was found in 6MWT distance. In lung functions, FEV1 improved from 52.30 % to 56.73 % of predicted and FVC improved from 56.20 % to 58.20 % of predicted. The mean difference of FEV1 and FVC was 4.43 to 2.0, respectively. : An 8-week supervised pulmonary rehabilitation program has demonstrated that the inclusion of pulmonary rehabilitation, not only reduces the symptoms but also improves the exercise capacity and add significant positive effect on the quality of life as well as lung functions in patients with chronic respiratory disease.

Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation duration on exercise capacity and health‐related quality of life in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PuRe Duration Trial): A randomized controlled equivalence trial

Effect of a pulmonary rehabilitation programme of 8 weeks compared to 12 weeks duration on exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PuRe Duration): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus pulmonary rehabilitation in severe COPD: a randomised multicentre trial

Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physiologic and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Long-term efficiency of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis, and asthma: Does it differ?

The Short-Term Efficacy of a Three-Week Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program among Patients with Obstructive Lung Diseases

Effect of 12-week pulmonary rehabilitation on cognitive function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: study protocol for a single-center randomised controlled trial

SPACE FOR COPD delivered as a maintenance programme on pulmonary rehabilitation discharge: protocol of a randomised controlled trial evaluating the long-term effects on exercise tolerance and mental well-being

Long-term evaluation of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD

Pulmonary Rehabilitation Once a Week for One Year in a Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Optimising PR for COPD: Does Severity Matter?

Pulmonary rehabilitation ameliorates regional lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective single-arm clinical trial

Do pulmonary rehabilitation participants become more active? A quasi-experimental study based on a outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program.

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on lung functions and quality of life in chronic respiratory disease patients

Long-Term Effectiveness of a Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Older People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Study

Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program on Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Endurance or resistance training in primary care after in-patient rehabilitation for COPD?

Pulmonary rehabilitation for acute and stable COPD : a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Effects of comprehensive and intensive pulmonary rehabilitation and nutritional support on quality of life and functional status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

A better response in exercise capacity after pulmonary rehabilitation in more severe COPD patients

Effectiveness of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): systematic review