Abstract:Importance Surgical site infections (SSIs)—especially anastomotic dehiscence—are major contributors to morbidity and mortality after rectal resection. The role of mechanical and oral antibiotics bowel preparation (MOABP) in preventing complications of rectal resection is currently disputed. Objective To assess whether MOABP reduces overall complications and SSIs after elective rectal resection compared with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) plus placebo. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 university hospitals in Finland between March 18, 2020, and October 10, 2022. Patients aged 18 years and older undergoing elective resection with primary anastomosis of a rectal tumor 15 cm or less from the anal verge on magnetic resonance imaging were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat principle, which included all patients who were randomly allocated to and underwent elective rectal resection with an anastomosis. Interventions Patients were stratified according to tumor distance from the anal verge and neoadjuvant treatment given and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive MOABP with an oral regimen of neomycin and metronidazole (n = 277) or MBP plus matching placebo tablets (n = 288). All study medications were taken the day before surgery, and all patients received intravenous antibiotics approximately 30 minutes before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was overall cumulative postoperative complications measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index. Key secondary outcomes were SSI and anastomotic dehiscence within 30 days after surgery. Results In all, 565 patients were included in the analysis, with 288 in the MBP plus placebo group (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-74] years; 190 males [66.0%]) and 277 in the MOABP group (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-75] years; 158 males [57.0%]). Patients in the MOABP group experienced fewer overall postoperative complications (median [IQR] Comprehensive Complication Index, 0 [0-8.66] vs 8.66 [0-20.92]; Wilcoxon effect size, 0.146; P &lt; .001), fewer SSIs (23 patients [8.3%] vs 48 patients [16.7%]; odds ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.27-0.77]), and fewer anastomotic dehiscences (16 patients [5.8%] vs 39 patients [13.5%]; odds ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.72]) compared with patients in the MBP plus placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that MOABP reduced overall postoperative complications as well as rates of SSIs and anastomotic dehiscences in patients undergoing elective rectal resection compared with MBP plus placebo. Based on these findings, MOABP should be considered as standard treatment in patients undergoing elective rectal resection. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04281667

Does a Preoperative Bowel Regimen Change Time to Bowel Movement? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Preoperative Optimization of Promotility in Robotic Prostatectomy and Minimally Invasive Kidney Surgery

Effectiveness of Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: a Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial

A randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of pre- and post-surgical pelvic floor physiotherapy for bowel symptoms, pelvic floor function, and quality of life of patients with rectal cancer: CARRET protocol

[Early Outcomes of Elective Surgery for Colon Cancer with Preoperative Mechanical Bowel Preparation: a Randomized Clinical Trial].

Effectiveness of a Preoperative Bowel Preparation Protocol for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis to Decrease Postoperative Gastrointestinal Morbidities and the Hospital Length of Stay

Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery® Protocol Compliance on Length of Stay, Bowel Recovery and Complications after Radical Cystectomy

Modified intestinal isolation bag as promising tool in promoting bowel resumption after ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Early safety and efficiency outcomes of a novel interdisciplinary laparoscopic resection rectopexy combined with sacrocolpopexy for women with obstructive defecation syndrome and pelvic organ prolapse: a single center study

Impact of Surgical and Anesthetic Procedures after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study (The PROCOL Study)

A systematic review of best practices for the perioperative management of abdominal sacrocolpopexy

Effect of Bowel Preparation Before Vaginal Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Pelvic Floor Disorders

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of ramosetron on postoperative restoration of bowel motility after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery

Bowel stimulation before loop ileostomy closure to reduce postoperative ileus: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial

Analysis of Robotic Procedural Times Using Colpassist Versus End-to-End Anastomosis Sizer for Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized clinical trial of the influence of mechanical bowel preparation on faecal microflora in patients undergoing colonic cancer resection

Morbidity After Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Prior to Rectal Resection

Comparison of two bowel treatments to prevent constipation in post-surgical orthopaedic patients

[A Randomized Single Blind Comparison of Conventional Bowel Preparation and Unplanned Preoperative Preparation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse].

Prehab, ERAS, Rehab: A patient care continuum around colo-rectal surgery: Prehabilitation combined with ERAS and rehabilitation to reduce morbidity and hospital stay

Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block benefits the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial