Abstract:Background: Prospective cohorts may be vulnerable to bias due to attrition. Inverse probability weights have been proposed as a method to help mitigate this bias. The current study used the "All Our Families" longitudinal pregnancy cohort of 3351 maternal-infant pairs and aimed to develop inverse probability weights using logistic regression models to predict study continuation versus drop-out from baseline to the three-year data collection wave. Methods: Two methods of variable selection took place. One method was a knowledge-based a priori variable selection approach, while the second used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). The ability of each model to predict continuing participation through discrimination and calibration for both approaches were evaluated by examining area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and calibration plots, respectively. Stabilized inverse probability weights were generated using predicted probabilities. Weight performance was assessed using standardized differences of baseline characteristics for those who continue in study and those that do not, with and without weights (unadjusted estimates). Results: The a priori and LASSO variable selection method prediction models had good and fair discrimination with AUROC of 0.69 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.67-0.71) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.75), respectively. Calibration plots and non-significant Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit Tests indicated that both the a priori (p = 0.329) and LASSO model (p = 0.242) were well-calibrated. Unweighted results indicated large (> 10%) standardized differences in 15 demographic variables (range: 11 - 29%), when comparing those who continued in the study with those that did not. Weights derived from the a priori and LASSO models reduced standardized differences relative to unadjusted estimates, with the largest differences of 13% and 5%, respectively. Additionally, when applying the same LASSO variable selection method to develop weights in future data collection waves, standardized differences remained below 10% for each demographic variable. Conclusion: The LASSO variable selection approach produced robust weights that addressed non-response bias more than the knowledge-driven approach. These weights can be applied to analyses across multiple longitudinal waves of data collection to reduce bias.

Examining Optimal Weights for the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument in North Dakota

Selecting Items to Compose a Brief Version of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory Using Machine Learning, Sparse Modeling

Developing a Predictive Tool for Psychological Well-Being among Chinese Adolescents in the Presence of Missing Data

Examining the measurement precision of behavior problems among a sample of primarily rural youth on juvenile probation and their parents

Too risky to use, or too risky not to? Lessons learned from over 30 years of research on forensic risk assessment with Indigenous persons.

A Second Proof of Concept Investigation of Strengths Using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth Tool With Justice-Involved Youth: Item Level Risk-Based Effects and Interactions

Dynamic violence risk, protective factors, and therapeutic change in a gender and ethnoculturally diverse sample of court-adjudicated youth.

The validity of risk assessment instruments for transition-age youth.

Development and content validation of the Youth Australian and New Zealand Evaluation of Fitness to Stand Trial–Revised (Youth ANZ–EFST–R)

The Effect of Missing Item Data on the Relative Predictive Accuracy of Correctional Risk Assessment Tools

Evaluating the Clinical Utility of the MAYSI-2 Among African American Male Juvenile Offenders

Re‐Examining the Predictive Validity and Establishing Risk Levels for the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression: Youth Version

Examining the validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) for predicting probation outcomes among adjudicated juvenile offenders.

Developing non-response weights to account for attrition-related bias in a longitudinal pregnancy cohort

Spectral Graph Sample Weighting for Interpretable Sub-cohort Analysis in Predictive Models for Neuroimaging

Cross-Validation and Development of Empirically Derived ADHD Assessment Strategies: Insights From the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health)

A factor analytic approach to understanding health risk behaviors and resilience among multi-racial/ethnic adolescents in New Mexico

MACI Scores of African American Males in a Forensic Setting: Are We Measuring What We Think We Are Measuring?

Justice involvement prediction as individuals age: An age-graded evaluation of the public safety assessment.

Alternatives to Weighted Item Fit Statistics for Establishing Measurement Invariance in Many Groups

The role of weighting adjustment for attrition in longitudinal trajectory modeling: a simulation study