Abstract:Competence to stand trial is a legal construct used to identify those criminal defendants who have the requisite mental capacity to understand the nature and objective of the proceedings against them and to participate rationally in preparing their defense. This Practice Guideline has described how psychiatrists should evaluate individuals concerning their competence to stand trial. The Guideline describes acceptable forensic psychiatric practice for such evaluations. Where possible, it specifies standards of practice and principles of ethics and also emphasizes the importance of analyzing an individual defendant's case in the context of statutes and case law applicable in the jurisdiction where the evaluation takes place. The recommendations in the Guideline both reflect and are limited by evolving case law, statutory requirements, legal publications, and the current state of psychiatric knowledge. The authors have taken note of nationally applicable case law, federal constitutional standards, statutory language, and federal and state interpretations of the rights or statutes, recognizing that jurisdictions may differ in their specific interpretation or application of statutes or general constitutional standards. The review of cases concerning specific psychiatric diagnoses illustrates general U.S. trends, and psychiatrists must remain cognizant of their jurisdictions' interpretations of statutes or constitutional requirements. By surveying a variety of practices and approaches to data gathering and case analysis, the authors believe that this Guideline will stimulate additional collegial discussion about what is necessary and sufficient for adequate evaluations of adjudicative competence. The notion that psychiatrists should apply expertise to competence assessments stems from the principal that, before allowing a defendant to face criminal prosecution and possible punishment, courts need reasonable assurance--based, if necessary, on a careful, individualized evaluation--that the defendant has adequate mental capacity to make a defense. At a minimum, a psychiatrist's opinion about adjudicative competence should reflect an understanding of the jurisdictional standard and of how the defendant's mental condition affects competence as defined with the jurisdiction. The psychiatrist's report should clearly describe the opinion and the reasoning that leads to it. Psychiatrists who provide mental health expertise concerning adjudicative competence give trial courts information needed to assure that defendants can appropriately protect themselves and that criminal proceedings will be accurate, dignified,and just.

Development and content validation of the Youth Australian and New Zealand Evaluation of Fitness to Stand Trial–Revised (Youth ANZ–EFST–R)

Identifying studies examining the validity of instruments for use as outcome measures in child and adolescent forensic mental health services: a systematic review

AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial

Validation study of the Roberts Apperception Test for Children (RATC) in an adolescents' forensic sample

Psychological Assessment of Adolescent Offenders: Validity of the Brazilian Jesness Inventory–Revised

Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents

Fitness to stand trial: 415 consecutive defendants assessed by a New Zealand forensic psychiatry service

The impact of interview quality on risk assessment of young people who sexually offend

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the child forensic attitude scale

The Work and Social Adjustment Scale, Youth and Parent Versions: Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Measure of Functional Impairment in Young People

Too risky to use, or too risky not to? Lessons learned from over 30 years of research on forensic risk assessment with Indigenous persons.

Validating cognitive screening in young people with first‐episode psychosis: The CogScreen protocol

Examining the psychometric properties of the headspace Youth (mental health) Service Satisfaction Scale in a mental health service in Ireland

Cross-Cultural Fairness of the PCL: SV: A New Zealand Analysis

An examination of executive functioning in adolescents with FASD in a self-regulation intervention

Solutions Trial: Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) in 10–17-year-olds presenting at police custody: a randomised controlled trial

Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire

Developing and Initially Validating the Youth Mental Health Literacy Scale for Ages 11–14

Establishing the Validity and Reliability of the Student Practice Evaluation Form-Revised (SPEF-R) in Occupational Therapy Practice Education: A Rasch Analysis

Screening and identification of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in criminal legal settings: A realist review

Development of a 21-item short form of the Attitudes to Sexual Offenders (ATS) Scale.