Laparoscopic intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement: multi-institutional data from 102 patients

Alexey Kochkin,Christos Kalfountzos,Eduard Gallyamov,Rafael Biktimirov,Andrey Sanzharov,Vladimir Sergeev,Sergey Popov,Fabrizio Dal Moro,Theodoros Tokas,Ali Serdar Gözen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2302889
2024-01-26
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies
Abstract:Objective: To present long-term results of our laparoscopic intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement (LIUR) cohort, including more complex cases of laparoscopic ileocalycostomy. Material and methods: We collected records of patients undergoing LIUR. Follow-up included a chemical profile and urine cultures. Imaging consisted of renal ultrasonography, excretory urography, cystography, and computer tomographic or magnetic resonance urography. Results: One hundred and two patients were included. Stricture location was left (46.1%), right (39.2%), or bilateral (14.7%). No open conversion was performed. Seventy-four patients (72.5%) underwent a total ureteral unit removal. The mean operative time was 289.4 (120 – 680) minutes. The estimated blood loss was 185.2 (10–400) mL. Three patients had intraoperative complications, and fifteen had early postoperative complications. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.2 (7–35) days. The mean follow-up duration period was 37.7 (12–162) months. Most patients' follow-up was uneventful (88%), and seven patients presented with Grade 2 late complications. Conclusions: Intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement in cases of extensive ureteral lesions offers optimal long-term outcomes and a low complication rate. Ileocalycostomy constitutes a viable option in the small group of patients with long proximal ureteral strictures and intrarenal pelvis.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?