Long-Term Efficacy of Evolocumab in Patients With or Without Multivessel Coronary Disease

Daniel J McClintick,Michelle L O'Donoghue,Gaetano M De Ferrari,Jorge Ferreira,Xinhui Ran,KyungAh Im,J Antonio G López,Mary Elliott-Davey,Bei Wang,Maria Laura Monsalvo,Dan Atar,Anthony Keech,Robert P Giugliano,Marc S Sabatine,Daniel J. McClintick,Michelle L. O’Donoghue,Gaetano M. De Ferrari,J. Antonio G. López,Robert P. Giugliano,Marc S. Sabatine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.029
IF: 24
2024-02-07
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Abstract:Background In FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk), during a median follow-up of 2.2 years, risk reduction for major adverse cardiovascular event with evolocumab was greater in patients with multivessel disease (MVD). The FOURIER Open-Label Extension (FOURIER-OLE) provides an additional median follow-up of 5 years. Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term benefit of evolocumab in patients with and without MVD. Methods FOURIER randomized 27,564 patients to evolocumab vs placebo; 6,635 entered FOURIER-OLE. Patients with coronary artery disease were categorized based on the presence of MVD (≥40% stenosis in ≥2 large vessels). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina , or coronary revascularization; the key secondary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results Of 23,656 patients in FOURIER with coronary artery disease, 25.4% had MVD; 5,887 patients continued into FOURIER-OLE. The risk reduction with initial allocation to evolocumab tended to be greater in patients with MVD than in those without: 23% (HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.68-0.87]) vs 11% (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.82-0.96]) for the primary and 31% (HR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.59-0.81]) vs 15% (HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.77-0.94]) for the key secondary endpoints ( P interaction = 0.062 and P interaction = 0.031, respectively). The magnitude of benefit tended to grow during the first several years, reaching 37% to 38% reductions in risk in patients with MVD and 23% to 28% reductions in risk in patients without MVD. Conclusions Evolocumab reduced the rate of major adverse cardiovascular event in patients with and without MVD. The benefit tended to occur earlier and was larger in patients with MVD. However, the magnitude grew over time in both groups. These data support early initiation of intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering both in patients with and without MVD.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?