Abstract:Epistemic trust (ET) refers to trust in communicated knowledge. This paper describes the development and validation of a new self-report questionnaire, the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ). We report on two studies (Study 1, n = 500; Study 2, n = 705) examining the psychometric properties of the ETMCQ and the relationship between EMTCQ scores (i.e., an individual’s epistemic stance) and exposure to adverse childhood experiences, mental health symptoms, attachment, mentalizing and general self-efficacy. The factor structure of the ETMCQ was examined using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses, and its reliability and test-retest reliability were tested. Both studies yielded three correlated yet distinct factors–Trust, Mistrust and Credulity–and confirmed the reliability and validity of the ETMCQ. Preregistered hypotheses were confirmed and replicated across both studies. Main findings suggest intriguing links between the ETMCQ and developmental psychopathology constructs and are consistent with thinking on the role of epistemic stance in undermining adaptation and increasing the developmental risk of mental health problems. Mistrust and Credulity scores were associated with childhood adversity and higher scores on the global psychopathology severity index and both factors partially mediated the link between early adversity and mental health symptoms. Mistrust and Credulity were positively associated with difficulties in understanding mental states and insecure attachment styles. Post-hoc analysis identified that different attachment styles were associated with differences in epistemic stance. In addition, Trust was not associated with reduced levels of mental health symptoms and did not moderate the impact of childhood adversity–findings are congruent with the suggestion that the reduction of mistrust and credulity may be crucial common factors in promoting resilience and the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions. This investigation and the ETMCQ provide an empirical measure of what until now has been largely a theoretical concept and open new avenues for future research.

Developmental trajectory of children's epistemic and interpersonal trust decision for acting and testifying informants

Impact of measurement activities on young children's epistemic and interpersonal trust

Selective trust: Children's use of intention and outcome of past testimony.

Updating trust: How children combine trait information with prior accuracy as they interact with an informant.

Children Infer Intentions by Assessing Epistemic Attitudes in Interpersonal Interactions

In the Presence and Absence of Conflicting Testimony, Children's Selective Trust in the In-Group Informant in Moral Judgment and Knowledge Access.

What’s the Evidence Say? The Relation Between Evidential-Trust and Theory of Mind

Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations among Children's Interpersonal Trust, Reputation for Trustworthiness, and Relationship Closeness

Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations Among Children’s Interpersonal Trust, Reputation for Trustworthiness, and Relationship Closeness

Children's Social Epistemology: Children's Selective Trust in Informants

The development of intent-based trust in moral testimony

The Impact of Emotional Expressions on Children's Trust Judgments.

Development of Preschool Children's Selective Trust Based on Judgments of Information -Its Continuity and Its Relationship with Interpersonal Trust

Trusting others: shared reality in testimonial learning

Children presume confident informants will be accurate (until proven otherwise)

Trusting information from friends: Adults expect it but preschoolers do not.

Impact of Bystander's Non-verbal Cues on Preschoolers' Selective Trust

Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust

Says who? Children consider informants' sources when deciding whom to believe.

Trust in adolescence: Development, mechanisms and future directions

Trusting young children to help causes them to cheat less