Abstract:Due to the large number of different docking programs and scoring functions available, researchers are faced with the problem of selecting the most suitable one when starting a structure-based drug discovery project. To guide the decision process, several studies comparing different docking and scoring approaches have been published. In the context of comparing scoring function performance, it is common practice to use a predefined, computer-generated set of ligand poses (decoys) and to reevaluate their score using the set of scoring functions to be compared. But are predefined decoy sets able to unambiguously evaluate and rank different scoring functions with respect to pose prediction performance? This question arose when the pose prediction performance of our piecewise linear potential derived scoring functions (Korb et al. in J Chem Inf Model 49:84–96, 2009) was assessed on a standard decoy set (Cheng et al. in J Chem Inf Model 49:1079–1093, 2009). While they showed excellent pose identification performance when they were used for rescoring of the predefined decoy conformations, a pronounced degradation in performance could be observed when they were directly applied in docking calculations using the same test set. This implies that on a discrete set of ligand poses only the rescoring performance can be evaluated. For comparing the pose prediction performance in a more rigorous manner, the search space of each scoring function has to be sampled extensively as done in the docking calculations performed here. We were able to identify relative strengths and weaknesses of three scoring functions (ChemPLP, GoldScore, and Astex Statistical Potential) by analyzing the performance for subsets of the complexes grouped by different properties of the active site. However, reasons for the overall poor performance of all three functions on this test set compared to other test sets of similar size could not be identified.

Topology-Based and Conformation-Based Decoys Database: An Unbiased Online Database for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions

TocoDecoy: A New Approach to Design Unbiased Datasets for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions

A Case-Based Meta-Learning Algorithm Boosts the Performance of Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

Decoy Selection for Protein Structure Prediction Via Extreme Gradient Boosting and Ranking

DeepBSP—a Machine Learning Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein–Ligand Docking Structures

Artefacts and biases affecting the evaluation of scoring functions on decoy sets for protein structure prediction

A Generalized Protein-Ligand Scoring Framework with Balanced Scoring, Docking, Ranking and Screening Powers.

From machine learning to deep learning: Advances in scoring functions for protein–ligand docking

Deep reinforcement learning enables better bias control in benchmark for virtual screening

Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein–Ligand Scoring Functions

Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performance Via Learning from Scoring Function Components

Accuracy or novelty: what can we gain from target-specific machine-learning-based scoring functions in virtual screening?

Beware of the Generic Machine Learning-Based Scoring Functions in Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

Binding Affinity Prediction with 3D Machine Learning: Training Data and Challenging External Testing

Dowker complex based machine learning (DCML) models for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

The Impact of Cross-Docked Poses on Performance of Machine Learning Classifier for Protein–ligand Binding Pose Prediction

RADER: a RApid DEcoy Retriever to facilitate decoy based assessment of virtual screening

Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Can Machine Learning Consistently Improve the Scoring Power of Classical Scoring Functions? Insights into the Role of Machine Learning in Scoring Functions.

MUBD-DecoyMaker 2.0: A Python GUI Application to Generate Maximal Unbiased Benchmarking Data Sets for Virtual Drug Screening

DLSCORE: A Deep Learning Model for Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities