Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution

Arturo Evangelista, Debabrata Mukherjee, Rajendra H Mehta, Patrick T O’Gara, Rossella Fattori, Jeanna V Cooper, Dean E Smith, Jae K Oh, Stuart Hutchison, Udo Sechtem, Eric M Isselbacher, Christoph A Nienaber, Linda A Pape, Kim A Eagle
2005-03-01
Abstract:Background— The definition, prevalence, outcomes, and appropriate treatment strategies for acute intramural hematoma (IMH) continue to be debated. Methods and Results— We studied 1010 patients with acute aortic syndromes who were enrolled in the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD) to delineate the prevalence, presentation, management, and outcomes of acute IMH by comparing these patients with those with classic aortic dissection (AD). Fifty-eight (5.7%) patients had IMH, and this cohort tended to be older (68.7 versus 61.7 years; P<0.001) and more likely to have distal aortic involvement (60.3% versus 35.3%; P<0.001) compared with 952 patients with AD. Patients with IMH described more severe initial pain than did those with AD but were less likely to have ischemic leg pain, pulse deficits, or aortic valve insufficiency; moreover, they required a longer time to diagnosis and more …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?