Claims for 1.9–2.0 Ma old early Acheulian and Oldowan occupations at Melka Kunture are not supported by a robust age model

Tegenu Gossa,Asfawossen Asrat,Erella Hovers,Andrew J. Tholt,Paul R. Renne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108506
IF: 4.456
2024-01-22
Quaternary Science Reviews
Abstract:In the chronostratigraphic studies of sedimentary successions across eastern Africa, it is common practice to integrate paleomagnetic studies with radioisotopic dating to provide additional age resolution and refine age models. Muttoni et al. (2023) followed a similar approach. However, they inconsistently and selectively focused on certain dated tuff units as a basis for their correlation across sections. They utilized dated tuff units as anchors of correlation whenever they fit their age
geosciences, multidisciplinary,geography, physical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?