Toward a Robust Plio‐Pleistocene Chronostratigraphy for ODP Site 762

Gerald Auer,David De Vleeschouwer,Beth A. Christensen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl085198
IF: 5.2
2020-02-03
Geophysical Research Letters
Abstract:The advent of rapidly acquired proxy records provides paleoceanographers and paleoclimatologists with a wealth of high‐resolution data. These data are a boon for the community, as they enable millennial or even submillennial scale interpretation of past climate and ocean change. Multisite and multiproxy research permits regional and global correlations with high precision. Yet, accuracy is sometimes lost sight of, resulting in inaccurate age constraints. To highlight the importance of chronostratigraphic accuracy, we examine a recent publication by Stuut et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083035) that presents a chronostratigraphic framework potentially at odds with regional chronostratigraphy by up to 300 kyr in the Pliocene and 600 kyr in the Pleistocene. Using all available chronostratigraphic data, we provide an alternate integrated stratigraphic framework resulting in a higher degree of uniformity among regional climate archives and confirm the timing of a major climatic transition in Australia between ~3.55 and 3.3 Ma. The conversion of sedimentary thickness into time (age‐depth models) is fundamental to all scientific studies exploring past ocean and climate change. Current methods applied in the construction of these age models (chronostratigraphy) allows for high precision, primarily from tuning to orbital target curves. Yet without accuracy, age‐depth models can result in misleading conclusions regarding the timing, magnitude, and rates of past climate change. In this commentary, we focus on the eastern Indian Ocean and evaluate age‐depth models between 5.5 and 2 Ma (i.e., the Pliocene and Early Pleistocene) of marine sediments recovered in the region. We evaluate an age‐depth model recently presented by Stuut et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083035) and elucidate the impact of accuracy on direct comparisons with other records of Plio‐Pleistocene climate change in the region. We conclude that the different and independent sedimentary proxy records in the region show a contemporary response to external forcing at 3.55 to 3.3 Ma. We highlight the importance of “integrated stratigraphy” for constructing age models in modern paleoceanography and paleoclimatology We explore how equivocal age models may impede regional and global correlations using modern high precision multisite and multiproxy data We demonstrate how robust chronostratigraphies broaden the wealth of scientific knowledge obtained from IODP “legacy sites”
geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?