Deep learning-based diffusion tensor cardiac magnetic resonance reconstruction: a comparison study

Jiahao Huang,Pedro F. Ferreira,Lichao Wang,Yinzhe Wu,Angelica I. Aviles-Rivero,Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb,Andrew D. Scott,Zohya Khalique,Maria Dwornik,Ramyah Rajakulasingam,Ranil De Silva,Dudley J. Pennell,Sonia Nielles-Vallespin,Guang Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55880-2
IF: 4.6
2024-03-09
Scientific Reports
Abstract:In vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is a promising Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technique for evaluating the microstructure of myocardial tissue in living hearts, providing insights into cardiac function and enabling the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. However, the integration of cDTI into routine clinical practice poses challenging due to the technical obstacles involved in the acquisition, such as low signal-to-noise ratio and prolonged scanning times. In this study, we investigated and implemented three different types of deep learning-based MRI reconstruction models for cDTI reconstruction. We evaluated the performance of these models based on the reconstruction quality assessment, the diffusion tensor parameter assessment as well as the computational cost assessment. Our results indicate that the models discussed in this study can be applied for clinical use at an acceleration factor (AF) of and , with the D5C5 model showing superior fidelity for reconstruction and the SwinMR model providing higher perceptual scores. There is no statistical difference from the reference for all diffusion tensor parameters at AF or most DT parameters at AF , and the quality of most diffusion tensor parameter maps is visually acceptable. SwinMR is recommended as the optimal approach for reconstruction at AF and AF . However, we believe that the models discussed in this study are not yet ready for clinical use at a higher AF. At AF , the performance of all models discussed remains limited, with only half of the diffusion tensor parameters being recovered to a level with no statistical difference from the reference. Some diffusion tensor parameter maps even provide wrong and misleading information.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to accelerate the image reconstruction process through deep - learning techniques in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) to overcome the technical barriers of traditional cDTI techniques in clinical applications. Specifically, the paper explores three different deep - learning - based cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction models, aiming to evaluate the reconstruction quality, diffusion tensor parameter evaluation, and computational cost of these models under different acceleration factors (AF). ### Background and Challenges Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is an emerging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that can assess the microstructure of the living heart myocardial tissue, provide an in - depth understanding of cardiac function, and contribute to the development of innovative treatment strategies. However, the application of cDTI in routine clinical practice faces some technical challenges, mainly including: - **Low signal - to - noise ratio**: Due to the influence of heartbeats and respiratory movements, single - shot encoding acquisitions (such as single - shot echo - planar imaging SS - EPI or spiral diffusion - weighted imaging) usually result in a low signal - to - noise ratio of the image. - **Long scan time**: In order to improve the accuracy of diffusion tensor (DT) estimation, multiple repeated scans are required, which not only increases the total scan time but also leads to a poor patient experience. ### Research Objectives The main objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of three deep - learning - based MRI reconstruction models in cDTI. The specific objectives include: - **Evaluating reconstruction quality**: Measuring the reconstruction effect of the models under different acceleration factors by image quality evaluation metrics (such as PSNR, SSIM, etc.). - **Evaluating diffusion tensor parameters**: Examining the estimation accuracy of the models for diffusion tensor parameters (such as mean diffusivity MD, fractional anisotropy FA, helix angle HA, and second eigenvector E2A) under different acceleration factors. - **Evaluating computational cost**: Analyzing the computational efficiency of different models to determine their feasibility in clinical applications. ### Main Findings - **Under acceleration factors AF ×2 and ×4**: All models can meet the requirements of clinical applications. Among them, the D5C5 model performs best in terms of reconstruction fidelity, while the SwinMR model scores higher in terms of perceptual rating. All diffusion tensor parameters have no statistical difference from the reference image under AF ×2, and most parameters also reach the same level under AF ×4. - **Under acceleration factor AF ×8**: The performance of all models is limited. Only about half of the diffusion tensor parameters can be restored to a level with no statistical difference from the reference image, and some parameter maps even provide wrong and misleading information, which is unacceptable in clinical practice. ### Conclusion This study provides an important reference for deep - learning reconstruction in cDTI, indicating that at lower acceleration factors (AF ×2 and ×4), existing deep - learning models can be effectively applied in clinical practice, but further improvement is still required at higher acceleration factors (AF ×8). The SwinMR model is recommended as the best choice under AF ×2 and ×4.