Felid futures: crossing disciplines, borders, and generations

David W Macdonald, Andrew J Loveridge, Alan Rabinowitz

2010-01-01

Abstract:Conservationists, in our experience, increasingly find it necessary to navigate the corridors of government as they do the backwaters of the wildernesses they seek to protect. Decision-makers are as prone to fashionable catchphrases as are those in any other sector, and two such phrases that are current in British government-speak extol the merits of ‘joined-up thinking’and lament the inescapability of ‘hard choices’. These two phrases capture the essence of the view of felid conservation that we present in this chapter, thereby illustrating that the languages of conservation and politics have become inseparable. Consider, first, three things each of which is irredeemably joined up. First, the animals, together with the plants and their environment. No single individual can be understood, or conserved, other than in the context of its society, population, or metapopulation. No one species can be disentangled from the community of its predators, prey, and competitors, or from the ecosystem of which it is a working part. This joined-upness, the linkage, or conjugality of nature, demands joined-up thinking about conservation, and leads progressively from protected areas to corridors through landscapes to transboundary parks, and thus inevitably to land-use policy and politics. Second, the research disciplines and perspectives. Biology, and associated natural sciences, are necessary, but no longer sufficient, as the intellectual framework for conservation which now blends knowledge and techniques from the social sciences, economics, and thus politics. This rupture of the biological silo is embodied in the increasing migration of courses on conservation …