Abstract:Purpose The banking industry faces increasing scrutiny from stakeholders regarding its environmental and social impacts, given its crucial role in fostering economic growth. Banks have been encouraged to adopt environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices to mitigate risks and safeguard their reputation. However, the effectiveness of ESG sensitivity within the banking industry is contingent upon ownership and structural factors. The extent to which banks can integrate ESG considerations into their operations and decision-making processes may vary based on their ownership structures. Therefore, this study aims to examine if the impact of ESG on the performance of Indian banks varies between private and public sector banks. Design/methodology/approach The study employs six years of panel data from two separate samples of 12 private sector banks and 10 public sector banks in India. It utilises fixed and random effect estimation techniques with robust standard errors to derive accurate and reliable econometric results. Findings The main findings of this study reveal intriguing insights into the relationship between ESG factors and bank performance, considering the influence of ownership structure. For private sector banks, the ESG composite score, particularly the social dimension, negatively impacts financial performance. However, there is a contrasting positive effect on efficiency. In contrast, public sector banks demonstrate a positive and significant association between the environmental score and return on equity and non-performing assets. Practical implications The findings highlight the need for tailored strategies that align with ownership structure to achieve sustainable financial and societal outcomes in the banking industry. Furthermore, it emphasises the need for private-sector banks to streamline their ESG initiatives, especially in the social dimension, to mitigate negative impacts on their financial performance. Originality/value This study introduces a novel dimension by addressing the “one size fits all” bias in prior research that overlooked bank ownership differences when examining the impact of ESG factors on bank performance.

How do banks price carbon risk? Evidence from India

Examining the portfolio carbon footprint of Indian banking system

Carbon footprints of lending and bank performance: international evidence from panel data

How does carbon regulatory policy affect debt financing costs? Empirical evidence from China

How does carbon pressure affect corporate risk-taking? Evidence from Chinese energy firms

Information about Transition Risk and Bank Lending

Carbon neutrality, bank lending, and credit risk: Evidence from the Eurozone

Does ESG performance impact value and risk‐taking by commercial banks? Evidence from emerging market economies

Determinants of credit risk: Empirical evidence from Indian commercial banks

Bank green lending and credit risk: an empirical analysis of China's Green Credit Policy

Does carbon emission trading policy affect bank loans of firms? Evidence from China

Environmental regulation and the cost of debt: Evidence from the carbon emission trading system pilot in China

Carbon dioxide and asset pricing: Evidence from international stock markets

Do private and public sector banks respond to ESG in the same way? Some evidences from India

Navigating the trade‐off between corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of financing: Evidence from BRICS economies

Corporate governance: Does it matter management of carbon emission performance? An empirical analyses of Indian companies

Corporate governance determinants of asset quality in an emerging economy: evidence from Indian banks

The intricate interplay between carbon emissions, financial risk, and valuation

Corporate Sustainability and Capital Costs: A Panel Evidence from BRICS Countries

Income diversification patterns and their impact on bank risk

Does the market value the green credit performance of banks? Evidence from bank loan announcements