Abstract:Until recently, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) required the manual definition of all markers using a high-resolution measurement table. To automate this tedious and time-consuming process and to eliminate observer variabilities, an analytical software package has been developed and validated for the detection, identification, and matching of markers in RSA radiographs. The digital analysis procedure consisted of the following steps: (1) the detection of markers using a variant of the Hough circle-finder technique; (2) the identification and labeling of the detected markers; (3) the reconstruction of the three-dimensional position of the bone markers and the prosthetic markers; and (4) the computation of micromotion. To assess the influence of film digitization, the measurements obtained from nine phantom radiographs using two different film scanners were compared with the results obtained by manual processing. All markers in the phantom radiographs were automatically detected and correctly labeled. The best results were obtained with a Vidar VXR-12 CCD scanner, for which the measurement errors were comparable to the errors associated with the manual approach. To assess the in vivo reproducibility, 30 patient radiographs were analyzed twice with the manual as well as with the automated procedure. Approximately, 85% of all calibration markers and bone markers were automatically detected and correctly matched. The calibration errors and the rigid-body errors show that the accuracy of the automated procedure is comparable to the accuracy of the manual procedure. The rigid-body errors had comparable mean values for both techniques: 0.05 mm for the tibia and 0.06 mm for the prosthesis. The reproducibility of the automated procedure showed to be slightly better than that of the manual procedure. The maximum errors in the computed translation and rotation of the tibial component were 0.11 mm and 0.24, compared to 0.13 mm and 0.27 for the manual RSA procedure. The total processing time is less than 10 min per radiograph, including interactive corrections, compared to approximately 1 h for the manual approach. In conclusion, a new and widely applicable, computer-assisted technique has become available to detect, identify, and match markers in RSA radiographs and to assess the micromotion of endoprostheses. This new technique will be used in our clinic for our hip, knee, and elbow studies.

Radiographic measurements in distal radius fracture evaluation: a review of current techniques and a recommendation for standardization

Measurement of Radiological Parameters of Distal Radius Fracture Using the Ulnar Axis Compared with the Radial Axis

Automated computation of radiographic parameters of distal radial metaphyseal fractures in forearm X-rays

Radiographic Evaluation of Distal Radius Fracture Healing by Time: Orthopedist versus Qualitative Assessment of Image Processing

Computed tomography for the detection of distal radioulnar joint instability: normal variation and reliability of four CT scoring systems in 46 patients

Fast and accurate automated measurements in digitized stereophotogrammetric radiographs

Radiographic Humerus Union Measurement (RHUM) Demonstrates High Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability in Assessing Humeral Shaft Fracture Healing

AI for detection, classification and prediction of loss of alignment of distal radius fractures; a systematic review

Evaluating fracture healing using digital X-ray image analysis

Recommendation for measuring clinical outcome in distal radius fractures: a core set of domains for standardized reporting in clinical practice and research

[A Method of Measuring the Displacement of the Distal Radioulnar Joint on the Three-Dimensional CT Imaging].

In vivo measurement of distal radioulnar translation following distal radius fracture

Serial Range of Motion and Grip Strength Measurements, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Radiographic Thresholds Associated With Less Satisfactory Outcomes after Low-Energy Distal Radius Fracture in Women Aged 50 Years and Older

AI-based X-ray fracture analysis of the distal radius: accuracy between representative classification, detection and segmentation deep learning models for clinical practice

Improvements in radiographic and clinical assessment of distal radius fracture healing by FE-estimated bone stiffness

Assessing the efficacy of manual reduction and novel traction techniques for distal radius fractures: A randomized controlled trial

Incident Fractures of the Distal Radius: Dual-Energy CT-derived Metrics For Opportunistic Risk Stratification

Reliability of Radiographic Union Scoring in Humeral Shaft Fractures

Establishment and preliminary evaluation of CT-based classification for distal radius fracture

Radiological Approach to Assessment of Lower-Limb Alignment—Coronal and Transverse Plane Analysis

Advancements in Diagnosis and Management of Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability: A Comprehensive Review Including a New Classification for DRUJ Injuries